|
|
#1
06-20-2005, 08:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I\'m completely miffed at this call by another 2+2er
NL Hold'em $30 Buy-in + $3 Entry Fee
Level:7 Blinds(150/300) Seat 1 is the button Total number of players : 4 Seat 1: Sponger ( $2310 ) Seat 5: Anamik ( $1900 ) Seat 6: 2+2er ( $2760 ) Seat 7: rolos13 ( $1030 ) ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to Sponger [ Xd Xs ] rolos13 is all-In [1030] Sponger folds. Anamik folds. 2+2er calls [730]. ** Dealing Flop ** [ 6c, Jc, 5d ] ** Dealing Turn ** [ Ac ] ** Dealing River ** [ 7h ] rolos13 shows [ Kc, Ts ] high card ace. 2+2er shows [ 3s, 7c ] a pair of sevens. 2+2er wins 2210 chips from the main pot with a pair of sevens. rolos13 finished in fourth place. rolos13 has left the table. 
|
|
#6
06-20-2005, 08:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I\'m completely miffed at this call by another 2+2er
I don't think the call was all that bad... Perfect? no probably not, but I wasnt there so I dont know the mechanics of how the table was playing.
Perhaps he was multitabling and made a fast call based on pot odds. He had + chip EV to call and getting the chip edge going into the money also has its advanatges. Losing 730 chips hardly makes a dent in him. The small stack really wont be small enough (after a successful steal) to push with any 2 against the other 2 opponents, nor will his stack be a tower if he folds. In short If he calls and loses he hardly loses anything If he calls and wins he gains 100% chance for ITM and a very nice chip lead going into it, with position on you. It's not like you were a shoe in for ITM if he folded. Is my sarcasm detector on tilt?
|
|
#7
06-20-2005, 08:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I\'m completely miffed at this call by another 2+2er
[ QUOTE ]
Is my sarcasm detector on tilt? [/ QUOTE ] No I'm being serious.
|
|
#9
06-20-2005, 09:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I\'m completely miffed at this call by another 2+2er
I like it too, simply because of the chip stack situation. He can afford to lose 730, and still be dead even with the rest of the field. If he wins, he's in a commanding position to take first.
|
|
#10
06-20-2005, 09:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I\'m completely miffed at this call by another 2+2er
Looks like a variation of the Q3o play...? 2+2er can afford to spend t730 on a call to defend his BB. He is getting decent odds (roughly 2:1) to call. He will have t2070 even if he loses and the message about his future BBs has been sent. I don't see that this is bad...? - w
ps: "miffed"??? You got ITM!
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
