Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-11-2005, 04:08 PM
sketchy1 sketchy1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 7
Default chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs

get ready AFC, this is the year.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-11-2005, 09:57 PM
Stellastarr Stellastarr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 57
Default Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs

Can we pick 1 rb and go with that? This tag-team [censored] is pissing me off.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-11-2005, 10:00 PM
battschr battschr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 280
Default Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs

I love it, as a fantasy owner of neither Johnson nor Holmes.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-12-2005, 12:29 AM
Tron Tron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Orange Bowl
Posts: 220
Default Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs

[ QUOTE ]
Can we pick 1 rb and go with that? This tag-team [censored] is pissing me off.

[/ QUOTE ]

Terrible idea.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-12-2005, 12:45 AM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: not the gay jack
Posts: 2,275
Default Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs

RB by committe <3
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-12-2005, 12:56 AM
FishHooks FishHooks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 596
Default Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs

haha yea me too, but they expected this so thats why I didn't pick Priest when I had the chance, I took Shawn alexander for the 3rd back taken.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-12-2005, 12:58 AM
FishHooks FishHooks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 596
Default Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs

If I'm not mistaken wasn't it a couple years ago the Chief's defence was decent in the first couple games then they were finally discovered, even though they had one of the best records in the AFC that year, they ended up losing in the first round.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-12-2005, 01:44 AM
Tron Tron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Orange Bowl
Posts: 220
Default Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs

[ QUOTE ]
If I'm not mistaken wasn't it a couple years ago the Chief's defence was decent in the first couple games then they were finally discovered, even though they had one of the best records in the AFC that year, they ended up losing in the first round.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep, that was just 2003. 13-3. And they lost to the Colts in the second round (They had a bye for the first, I think). But the defense today was better than decent, as far as I'm concerned.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-12-2005, 01:57 AM
lastchance lastchance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 766
Default Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs

Two Words: Colts. Patriots.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-27-2005, 12:18 AM
Dynasty Dynasty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,044
Default Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs

[ QUOTE ]
get ready AFC, this is the year.

[/ QUOTE ]

Perhaps not.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.