Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-02-2005, 10:24 AM
adios adios is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,298
Default Corps officials: Funding levels not to blame for flooding

Corps officials: Funding levels not to blame for flooding

However, they noted that the levees were designed for a Category 3 hurricane and couldn't handle the ferocious winds and raging waters from Hurricane Katrina, which was a Category 4 storm when it hit the coastline. The decision to build levees for a Category 3 hurricane was made decades ago based on a cost-benefit analysis.

On what basis was the decision made that the cost of protecting against a category 5 hurricane made to be too high?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-02-2005, 10:29 AM
Broken Glass Can Broken Glass Can is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: GWB is a man of True Character
Posts: 718
Default Re: Corps officials: Funding levels not to blame for flooding

Damn. You mean we can't blame Bush for diverting funds away from domestic safety?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-02-2005, 10:32 AM
SheetWise SheetWise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 841
Default Re: Corps officials: Funding levels not to blame for flooding

As I understand it, the computer models were not sophisticated enough at the time the decisions were made. Storms were not rated in the same way. They had a single model, which is what they used. The newer models identified the threat, and the studies had been done -- but even with funding they were 30 years away from a solution to Cat 5.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-02-2005, 10:48 AM
adios adios is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,298
Default Interesting Post. Thanks (n/m)

.....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-02-2005, 10:53 AM
adios adios is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,298
Default Some will find a way Irregardless of the facts

An opporuntiy to politicize an event never goes wasted with some and this happens on both the left and the right unfortuately.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-02-2005, 12:11 PM
Boris Boris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 945
Default Re: Corps officials: Funding levels not to blame for flooding

OK we can't blame him for the flooding. But he gets full credit for the pitiful response of FEMA and Homeland Security.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-02-2005, 12:18 PM
sam h sam h is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 742
Default Re: Corps officials: Funding levels not to blame for flooding

The relief effort and response has been basically incompetent, indicating that FEMA and local officials really weren't prepared for a situation in which communications would be compromised and security an issue. Whether additional funding would have improved preparedness or not is uncertain, but likely.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-02-2005, 02:51 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Corps officials: Funding levels not to blame for flooding

What would you expect them to say?

"We made a huge miscalculation, and we diverted a bunch of money to Iraq that probably should have been spent on the levees. Our bad. I'm sure we won't get fired for saying this, because the president always puts the truth ahead of politics."

To really answer that charge one way or the other, we need to hear from someone who doesn't have their job on the line.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-02-2005, 02:58 PM
Stu Pidasso Stu Pidasso is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 779
Default Re: Corps officials: Funding levels not to blame for flooding

[ QUOTE ]
OK we can't blame him for the flooding. But he gets full credit for the pitiful response of FEMA and Homeland Security.

[/ QUOTE ]

It would have been just as bad under any president. FEMA was not, nor have the ever been capable of responding to a disaster of this magnitude.

Stu
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-02-2005, 03:02 PM
cardcounter0 cardcounter0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,370
Default Joke from the Army Corps. of Engineers.

This was a joke a friend who was a career Army Corps. of Engineer employee:

Q. What is the difference between the Boy Scouts and the Army Corps. of Engineers?
A. The Boy Scouts have adult supervision.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.