#1
|
|||
|
|||
Strange hand, went on reads.
***** Hand History for Game 2706769946 *****
$100 NL Hold'em - Tuesday, September 13, 21:34:53 EDT 2005 Table Table 36934 (6 max) (Real Money) Seat 3 is the button Total number of players : 6 Seat 2: DUDE-1 ( $113 ) Seat 5: DUDE-2 ( $100 ) Seat 1: HERO ( $147.66 ) Seat 3: DUDE-3 ( $138.45 ) Seat 6: BLUFFER ( $43.20 ) Seat 4: UNKNOWN_PLAYER ( $98 ) UNKNOWN_PLAYER posts small blind [$0.50]. DUDE-2 posts big blind [$1]. ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to HERO [ As Js ] **** Figured I'd change it up some been raising a lot. BLUFFER calls [$1]. HERO calls [$1]. DUDE-1 folds. DUDE-3 folds. UNKNOWN_PLAYER calls [$0.50]. DUDE-2 checks. ** Dealing Flop ** [ 6s, Jh, Th ] UNKNOWN_PLAYER checks. DUDE-2 checks. BLUFFER bets [$2]. HERO raises [$7]. **** BLUFFER bets a lot draws. But I wanted to know if UNKNOWN had 2 pair or a str8/flush draw. He thought just enough about the flop to worry me. I figure if he goes over the top I fold. DUDE-2 is the BB so Im not worried random hand. UNKNOWN_PLAYER calls [$7]. **** I suspect draw. DUDE-2 folds. BLUFFER raises [$23]. **** He took no time to think just raised a random amount. He did the same thing before on another draw, bet, got raised, then reraise big. Does the same thing on the bluff. HERO is all-In [$139.66] **** Pushed to isolate bluffer and not give pot odds for the other draw. UNKNOWN_PLAYER is all-In [$90] **** This worried me. BLUFFER is all-In [$17.20] ** Dealing Turn ** [ Qc ] ** Dealing River ** [ Ah ] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
RESULTS, DONT READ!!!!
BLUFFER shows [ 8h, 6h ] a flush, ace high.
HERO shows [ As, Js ] two pairs, aces and jacks. UNKNOWN_PLAYER doesn't show [ Jd, Td ] two pairs, jacks and tens. HERO wins $49.66 from side pot #2 with two pairs, aces and jacks. HERO wins $109.60 from side pot #1 with two pairs, aces and jacks. BLUFFER wins $127.60 from the main pot with a flush, ace high. I got bluffer right but I thought that the unknown player his hand wrong. 2 draws on the board and I raised. I would figure a reraise is in order forcing the bluffer out. Am I wrong by his play or my play and deductions? I felt him just calling the flop and if bluffer just called he just gave him odds. So unknown would have against him 3x aces, 9x hearts, 2x 6s, and 2 backdoor straights. Realisitcally I would think in his position 9 flush outs, 3 overs, and 1 outs for the backdoor. A total of 13 outs which is almost even. I would reraise forcing everyone else out to win right there if I had JT 2 pair. Thoughts? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Strange hand, went on reads.
Why to get crazy with TPTK only with unknown in the hand?
Call and see the turn. Before looking to the answers my guests for hands are: Bluffer - JT Unknown - KTh |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Strange hand, went on reads.
Well the bluffer bets a lot of draws so I wanted to isolate him. Also I had been raising a lot with good aces, this time I limped so I figured he thought I had a crap J kicker. If he had 2 pair he would have pushed. Been watching his play for 1 hour. He was pretty predictable in his actions. Unknown was the real problem but I figured if he did have 2 pair or a set he would reraise me on the flop and I would get off only losing $7.
|
|
|