Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-25-2005, 03:58 PM
BradL BradL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 0
Default too much for too little?

First hand at table, playerview hasnt loaded yet and no notes on button.

Party Poker 15/30 Hold'em (10 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is BB with K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">7 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Button raises</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero calls.

Flop: (4.66 SB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, Hero calls.

Turn: (3.33 BB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, Button calls.

River: (7.33 BB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>...

Final Pot: 8.33 BB

I called the flop planning to checkraise bluff/semibluff any straight draw or heart. I was going to checkraise a jack and had not quite made up my mind about a king. Obviously the river is automatic but I was pretty unsure about the rest of the hand.

-Brad
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-25-2005, 04:11 PM
JAA JAA is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 95
Default Re: too much for too little?

I would really like this line if you had some read on the villain in this hand. Against a random Party $15 player (read:donkey), I don't know how successful you are going to be.

As an aside, I think I'm becoming too dependant on PlayerView. I'm beginning to get uncomfortable the two hands before it loads. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

- Jags
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-25-2005, 04:49 PM
lostinthought lostinthought is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 306
Default Re: too much for too little?

I agree - I like the play, but I like it better against someone I know who has a propensity to fold.

But if it didn't work I am sure it got you some action on later streets.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-26-2005, 02:00 AM
stoxtrader stoxtrader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 219
Default Re: too much for too little?

I generally c/r this type of flop. and then lead the turn if he calls. I think it's a slightly cheaper way of accomplishing the same thing.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-26-2005, 02:12 AM
surfdoc surfdoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 140
Default Re: too much for too little?

[ QUOTE ]
I generally c/r this type of flop. and then lead the turn if he calls. I think it's a slightly cheaper way of accomplishing the same thing.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you then laying it down if he calls and pops you back on the turn?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-26-2005, 02:17 AM
Lestat Lestat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 383
Default Re: too much for too little?

Serious question...

If you have a decent feel that your KJ is the best hand, then I think you should definitely play it as such. But do you really think it's necessary to so heavily contest such a small pot in a full game?

In other words, will this make or break you in the Party 15 games? I have to admit, I'll make my stands, but I don't always try to run an unimproved KJ through a stealer like poop through a goose. Many stealers would have ace/type hands that would've made a pair on this board or a straight draw which they are not folding to.

Again, I make my stands. I'll even sometimes bet or check/raise a KJ on an ace-high flop. But usually when I think I could have the best hand. Otherwise, I tend not to sweat the small pots in a full game. Do you think I'm giving up too much in these Party games?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-26-2005, 02:17 AM
BradL BradL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 0
Default Re: too much for too little?

[ QUOTE ]

Are you then laying it down if he calls and pops you back on the turn?

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the reason I favor waiting for the turn card in a spot like this. It "defines" your hand more clearly in your opponents eyes and leaves less room for him to get fancy without a real hand.

-Brad
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-26-2005, 02:21 AM
surfdoc surfdoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 140
Default Re: too much for too little?

[ QUOTE ]
Serious question...

If you have a decent feel that your KJ is the best hand, then I think you should definitely play it as such. But do you really think it's necessary to so heavily contest such a small pot in a full game?

In other words, will this make or break you in the Party 15 games? I have to admit, I'll make my stands, but I don't always try to run an unimproved KJ through a stealer like poop through a goose. Many stealers would have ace/type hands that would've made a pair on this board or a straight draw which they are not folding to.

Again, I make my stands. I'll even sometimes bet or check/raise a KJ on an ace-high flop. But usually when I think I could have the best hand. Otherwise, I tend not to sweat the small pots in a full game. Do you think I'm giving up too much in these Party games?

[/ QUOTE ]

Not at all. I agree. You certainly can't get bullied out of every pot but going apeshit is also not good.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-26-2005, 02:23 AM
BradL BradL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 0
Default Re: too much for too little?

[ QUOTE ]
But do you really think it's necessary to so heavily contest such a small pot in a full game?

[/ QUOTE ]

This is basically the question I was trying to ask. Not really small pots in general but situations like this where your hand may be best, but it is far more likely a small dog; however, the texture of the board allows for a number of powerful bluffs that your opponent would be hard-pressed to call down with A high unimproved or possibly a baby pair.

-Brad
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-26-2005, 02:24 AM
BradL BradL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 0
Default Re: too much for too little?

[ QUOTE ]
but going apeshit is also not good.

[/ QUOTE ]

Given the texture of the board is this really apeshit? Im not being sarcastic im seriously asking...

-Brad
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.