|
|
#41
10-12-2005, 03:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PSA: The upcoming Party decision
[ QUOTE ]
How much rake do you have to pay to earn 9,235 Party Points? [/ QUOTE ] It's just over 46,000 raked hands [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] Someone else figured it out to be about 12% of your rake. 
|
|
#43
10-12-2005, 04:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Player\'s Association
I agree with AAAA. There is strength in numbers. Individually, we have no pull with Party, Empire, or any other site. Put together a Player's Association of serious high volume players. Collectively, we would then have the economic clout to dictate which poker site gets all of our business. I guarantee you that everyone in the Association would get more rakeback then we are currently getting through Empire.
|
|
#44
10-12-2005, 04:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Player\'s Association
This is a great idea, but I believe this offer is being made right now. Millions of MGR is being offered to Party. X-Party skin affiliates with HUGE accounts are trying to get their players over there. Right now Party's stance is - No, we don't think it's worth it. Other casinos may be more receptive to this idea.
|
|
#46
10-12-2005, 08:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PSA: The upcoming Party decision
I really don't think than a decent rakeback offer will come from Party. The only reasons that I can think of for why they want to keep high-volume players is for marketing reasons and to keep the highest-level games going. The micro-limit and small stakes players probably only soak money from Party.
Where does the MGR from a shark come from? From the fish. If it weren't for the sharks, the fish would either keep playing til the rake ate away their winnings, or they would withdraw a bit. I expect that the rake eats more than their withdrawals. Hence, sharks just diminish the amount of money that Party takes from the fish. Party doesn't need us. They have a critical mass of players.
|
|
#47
10-12-2005, 09:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PSA: The upcoming Party decision
[ QUOTE ]
I really don't think than a decent rakeback offer will come from Party. The only reasons that I can think of for why they want to keep high-volume players is for marketing reasons and to keep the highest-level games going. The micro-limit and small stakes players probably only soak money from Party. Where does the MGR from a shark come from? From the fish. If it weren't for the sharks, the fish would either keep playing til the rake ate away their winnings, or they would withdraw a bit. I expect that the rake eats more than their withdrawals. Hence, sharks just diminish the amount of money that Party takes from the fish. Party doesn't need us. They have a critical mass of players. [/ QUOTE ] Party needs us just like they need everyone else. I provided a brief synopsis on the issue in another thread. Here is the link .
|
|
#48
10-12-2005, 09:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PSA: The upcoming Party decision
If I play on Party tonight (haven't played there since June):
Will this activity affect anything that might happen regarding reakeback? I have logged in to PP in the past few days. Or what? ty
|
|
#49
10-12-2005, 09:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PSA: The upcoming Party decision
[ QUOTE ]
link [/ QUOTE ] yeah good call. I figured party would just sit back and let the skins take all their business until no one played on party [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
|
#50
10-12-2005, 10:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PSA: The upcoming Party decision
[ QUOTE ]
If I play on Party tonight (haven't played there since June): Will this activity affect anything that might happen regarding reakeback? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, your old affiliate will be keeping all of it. I'm sure he'll be very happy.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
