Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-14-2005, 04:10 AM
J Chap J Chap is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 77
Default For Those Who Enjoy Meaningless Semantic Debates

Thank you in advance for being a nerd with me...

Here we go:

Flop is 3TJ rainbow. I have QK. I end up pushing all-in, and my opponent calls with AJ. No flush draws on the flop.

Given my correct inclination that I had 14 outs to the best hand, I was insulted by his insinuation that I got "lucky" when I won the hand. A polite altercation ensued.

He insisted that I needed to 'catch' in order to win. The way I see it, HE needed to catch cards-that-missed-me, which, in this case, were the minority. Basically, the fact that the first 5/7 of his Hold 'Em hand would make a higher-ranking Stud hand than mine is meaningless, since we were playing Hold 'Em. Right?

So, who, would you say, was "ahead" at the time?

Thank you for feeding my geekery.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-14-2005, 04:12 AM
J Chap J Chap is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 77
Default Re: For Those Who Enjoy Meaningless Semantic Debates

and my ego. because you will only reply if you agree.

jk jk

god i'm a loser
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2005, 10:25 AM
Tom1975 Tom1975 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 132
Default Re: For Those Who Enjoy Meaningless Semantic Debates

Sorry, you lose:

Holdem Hi: 990 enumerated boards containing Ts 3d Jh
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Js Ac 526 53.13 464 46.87 0 0.00 0.531
Qs Kc 464 46.87 526 53.13 0 0.00 0.469

He'll win 53.13%, you'll win 46.87%. Even if he had a two instead of an Ace, it would still only be 50/50.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-14-2005, 03:20 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: For Those Who Enjoy Meaningless Semantic Debates

'Ahead' in my opinion would mean who at a certain point is winning the hand. At the point in question he is ahead with a pair of Jacks to your King high. In the same way,

Kh Qh is not ahead of 2c 2d on a board of 10h Jh 10s, despite being a 71.465% favourite.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-14-2005, 03:54 PM
mackthefork mackthefork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: For Those Who Enjoy Meaningless Semantic Debates

You have only 13 outs and he will usually have a redraw of at least 3 cards.

Mack
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-14-2005, 06:02 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: For Those Who Enjoy Meaningless Semantic Debates

[ QUOTE ]
He insisted that I needed to 'catch' in order to win.

[/ QUOTE ]


Let him win the verbals. You concentrate on winning the pots.

Continue to feed his ego. He'll feed the pot.

To me, that's a win-win situation.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-15-2005, 12:18 AM
pzhon pzhon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 66
Default Re: For Those Who Enjoy Meaningless Semantic Debates

[ QUOTE ]
I was insulted by his insinuation that I got "lucky" when I won the hand.

[/ QUOTE ]
Whenever your opponent is all-in and not drawing dead, you need to be lucky to win. You expected to get less than the whole pot.

It doesn't make much of a difference if you have a slightly favorable coin-toss or one that is slightly unfavorable.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-15-2005, 02:45 AM
etizzle etizzle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 63
Default Re: For Those Who Enjoy Meaningless Semantic Debates

you were behind, but not by much. Who cares what he says though?

pokenum -h kh qc - ac js -- jh td 4c
Holdem Hi: 990 enumerated boards containing 4c Td Jh
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Qc Kh 464 46.87 526 53.13 0 0.00 0.469
Js Ac 526 53.13 464 46.87 0 0.00 0.531
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-15-2005, 05:25 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: For Those Who Enjoy Meaningless Semantic Debates

Pzhon is right: you are lucky on EVERY hand you win at showdown. So yes, you were lucky.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-15-2005, 01:08 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: For Those Who Enjoy Meaningless Semantic Debates

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
He insisted that I needed to 'catch' in order to win.

[/ QUOTE ]


Let him win the verbals. You concentrate on winning the pots.

Continue to feed his ego. He'll feed the pot.

To me, that's a win-win situation.

[/ QUOTE ]


Touche
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.