Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-14-2005, 04:09 PM
Koss Koss is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 38
Default Small pairs shorthanded

It's an older hand, but assume a pretty loose limper and atleast one blind will come along 70% of the time if I were to raise.

Party Poker 0.50/1 Hold'em (6 max, 4 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

Preflop: Hero is Button with 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
UTG calls, Hero????

Call and try to play it for set value, even though it's 4 handed? Try an isolation raise? Fold?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-14-2005, 04:17 PM
TheMainEvent TheMainEvent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 544
Default Re: Small pairs shorthanded

How can you isolate after 2 players have put 2 bets in already? I don't see any choice besides calling getting an effective 7-1.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2005, 04:19 PM
Koss Koss is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 38
Default Re: Small pairs shorthanded

Whoops. I meant to stop the hand at my first decision, not after I had called and the BB had raised. My bad!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-14-2005, 04:19 PM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 87
Default Re: Small pairs shorthanded

[ QUOTE ]
It's an older hand, but assume a pretty loose limper and atleast one blind will come along 70% of the time if I were to raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would raise anyway. Raising will get the flop checked to you more often and will increase the folds you get from villains postflop.

Since you limped, you've got to see the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-14-2005, 04:46 PM
Nikademus Nikademus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 32
Default Re: Small pairs shorthanded

[ QUOTE ]
assume a pretty loose limper and atleast one blind will come along 70% of the time if I were to raise.

Try an isolation raise?


[/ QUOTE ]
You answered your own question. Raising is not likely to isolate, so if you were to raise, would it instead be for value? I think I'd call here.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-14-2005, 05:01 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Small pairs shorthanded

I agree with the limp and call preflop. I think the more interesting question is what to do if it is folded to you on the button. I always heard never open-limp shorthanded. HEPFAP (pp 197-98) says you should at least consider open-limping here from the button if raising is unlikely to cause both blinds to fold. I've been playing with that some lately, but have no real opinions on it yet.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-14-2005, 05:18 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Small pairs shorthanded

Just call. You have position.

Had UTG folded, I would then raise.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-14-2005, 05:26 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Small pairs shorthanded

what does calling do for you here?
I say
raise>fold>>>call
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-14-2005, 05:28 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Small pairs shorthanded

[ QUOTE ]
Just call. You have position.


[/ QUOTE ]
???? this makes no sense to me. What is your logic?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-14-2005, 06:19 PM
DCWildcat DCWildcat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 358
Default Re: Small pairs shorthanded

Folding is by far the worst option here. I like raising for Aaron's reasons, limping is #2.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.