Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-08-2005, 09:00 PM
ADAMtheEXPERT ADAMtheEXPERT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 62
Default DISCUSSION OF MILITARY HISTORY

being the top genius in the world, in poker: I do get tired of it. If there is anyone, who is a military history buff, and would like to discuss things with me, such as battles, weapons, and such Please feel free to do so here, and please email me, to let me know. adamofalaska@hotmail.com


First subject: Do you think that Colt, paid off the army, to adopt the M16 rifle? As you know, the first versions, were horrible, and many troops were found dead, next to jammed rifles. Should the m14 have been the weapon of choice, or even the AR-10, considered by many to be the best battle rifle, of all time. Was it a good decision, to take away the full-auto feature, and make it a three-round burst, only.

If you were to go to war, and had to select a 5.56mm weapon, would it be the M16, or an HK-93, or a galai, Mini-14 select fire, Styre AUG, or WHAT.


I await your answer.


Adam
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-08-2005, 09:02 PM
threeonefour threeonefour is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: DISCUSSION OF MILITARY HISTORY

gimmick account?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-08-2005, 09:06 PM
squeek12 squeek12 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bobby J, \"The Cajun Cannon\"
Posts: 347
Default Re: DISCUSSION OF MILITARY HISTORY

[ QUOTE ]
gimmick account?

[/ QUOTE ]

Too many posts, I think this guy is serious. Is an M-16 sufficient to kill yourself with OP?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-08-2005, 09:12 PM
Dr. StrangeloveX Dr. StrangeloveX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: p1z0wnt3D by mods
Posts: 230
Default Re: DISCUSSION OF MILITARY HISTORY

lol
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-08-2005, 09:15 PM
exist exist is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 25
Default Re: DISCUSSION OF MILITARY HISTORY

steyer AUG, it's awesome in counter strike.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-08-2005, 09:36 PM
Ringo_Mojo Ringo_Mojo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bear is driving! How can that be?
Posts: 139
Default Re: DISCUSSION OF MILITARY HISTORY

[ QUOTE ]

First subject: Do you think that Colt, paid off the army, to adopt the M16 rifle? As you know, the first versions, were horrible, and many troops were found dead, next to jammed rifles. Should the m14 have been the weapon of choice, or even the AR-10, considered by many to be the best battle rifle, of all time. Was it a good decision, to take away the full-auto feature, and make it a three-round burst, only.

If you were to go to war, and had to select a 5.56mm weapon, would it be the M16, or an HK-93, or a galai, Mini-14 select fire, Styre AUG, or WHAT.


[/ QUOTE ]

Actually the jamming problems with the early M-16s were due to penny pinching Washington eggheads, who despite the Army's insistance otherwise, chose to not nickle plate the breeches in the original production of rifles. To further agrivate the problem, they also decided not to send any cleaning equipment with the new rifles. As any army DI will tell you dirty weapons == dead soldiers.

As for my chice of weapon, if i could only choose one, i would go with the AUG, versatility rules.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-08-2005, 09:47 PM
UCF THAYER UCF THAYER is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 35
Default Re: DISCUSSION OF MILITARY HISTORY

[ QUOTE ]

steyer AUG, it's awesome in counter strike.

[/ QUOTE ]

The Colt M-16 is a much better weapon in CS.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-08-2005, 09:56 PM
ChipWrecked ChipWrecked is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 667
Default Re: DISCUSSION OF MILITARY HISTORY

Wtf? Plasma rifle.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-08-2005, 10:15 PM
exist exist is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 25
Default Re: DISCUSSION OF MILITARY HISTORY

ain't no M16 in CS. that's an M4.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-08-2005, 10:17 PM
UCF THAYER UCF THAYER is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 35
Default Re: DISCUSSION OF MILITARY HISTORY

[ QUOTE ]
ain't no M16 in CS. that's an M4.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's what i meant, sorry.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.