#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would you call this River Bet when it\'s 2 back 2 u?
Grunching
Limping an ace early is not problematic, but the margin of error on NOT 3 betting as a limp reraise is probably more costly in the long run than any descision you make on a river like this. This is a four card straight and you're very likely to lose. I'd say you win about one time in fifteen, so if count donkmaster were a caller, it's a no brainer. However, he's a raiser. So the question is do you win one time in nine? Probably not with vilains' move, but it's close. As for the table. Party poker is a casino with magic teleporting seat changes. No one uses it as much as they could. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would you call this River Bet when it\'s 2 back 2 u?
There was a line 10 deep for a seat at this table. 1/2 full or 9 max always seem to have a waiting list after 9pm eastern.
As for loosing up with the two maniac's I tried a little later on in the night, but it's like playing bingo with those guys. Then a couple of guys sat down, and said sup bro? Donkmaster ran out of $$ so I ejected. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would you call this River Bet when it\'s 2 back 2 u?
Jesus would feel like he needs to find a new table and would do exactly that.
However this is poker, WWDSD. |
|
|