|
|
#1
09-06-2005, 01:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Supreme Court Decision That \"Sticks in your Craw\" the Most
So far the recent decision about eminent domain but admittedly haven't studied the opinions rendered is my choice.
I would think many on the left would say the decision in the 2000 presidential election. Roe v. Wade seems to be the most hated one for the right but not sure. Abortion is such a thorny issue that it's hard for me to want to do away with it entirely in my mind. I can think of a few others but for the most part I don't see that many decisions rendered by the Supreme Court that really "stick in my craw" but I concede maybe I'm not paying attention [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]. I do think the president should have the right to appoint "qualified" jurists to the court and that these appointments deserve an up and down vote. Qualified is open to debate. Signing out for the time being I'll be back tonight most likely. 
|
|
#2
09-06-2005, 01:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Supreme Court Decision That \"Sticks in your Craw\" the Most
Atkins death penalty case. I don't particulurly care about the death penalty (it seems fairly ineffective in modern America), but the logic used in the decision can make you a little sick to your stomach.
|
|
#3
09-06-2005, 01:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Supreme Court Decision That \"Sticks in your Craw\" the Most
Korematsu (relocation of 11,000+ Japanese Americans to prision camps was constitutionally permissible) was an absolute abomination.
|
|
#4
09-06-2005, 02:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Supreme Court Decision That \"Sticks in your Craw\" the Most
[ QUOTE ]
Korematsu (relocation of 11,000+ Japanese Americans to prision camps was constitutionally permissible) was an absolute abomination. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#5
09-06-2005, 02:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Supreme Court Decision That \"Sticks in your Craw\" the Most
Dred Scott Case.
|
|
#8
09-06-2005, 11:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Supreme Court Decision That \"Sticks in your Craw\" the Most
Other than the obvious blunders like Korematsu and Plessy v. Ferguson, I have to go with:
Wickard v. Filburn. Wickard is one of the fundamental pillars of law that continues to justify the undending drug war which is an atrocity against our freedoms. natedogg
|
|
#9
09-07-2005, 03:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Supreme Court Decision That \"Sticks in your Craw\" the Most
Miranda vs. The State of Arizona.
Why should the guilty be allowed to have a lawyer present during police questioning? After all they are guilty.
|
|
#10
09-07-2005, 05:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Supreme Court Decision That \"Sticks in your Craw\" the Most
Milliken v. Bradley
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
