Sweet, I think it's back

[busguy]

what he said

[SinCityGuy]

[ QUOTE ]
There are many good reasons for that clause to remain on Party's website.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, this certainly isn't one of them:

[ QUOTE ]
I would like to hear from Bev on the rakeback issue. I am reading on a few forums that not only are afilliates going to be offering rakeback, but they will be able to offer it with exisiting party players (from the sounds of it they would be opening a new account).

For the record I've never offered it as it was against the t+c's.

I'm going to wait and see what happens but it would be nice if somebody from Party spoke up....

Here is a hypothetical situation....let's say the rumours that we are reading on 2+2 are true, and that some affiliates will be switching existing players over to a rakeback....both which are against the t+c's. If Party knows about this and does nothing, do we have any recourse against Party?

They would not be enforcing the contract that was agreed upon, and that would have a negative impact on our business.

I'm sure it won't come to that, but I was just curious as I've been wondering how these developments will impact my income.

I guess it's just be patient until we hear from Party if they are enforcing their terms.

[/ QUOTE ]

You see, on this forum, we only hear from one side of the aisle. The actual affiliate representative from Party Poker (Bev) posts on that site (casinoaffiliateprograms.com), and she has the ear of the nonrakeback affiliates. It will be interesting to hear what she has to say when she responds to those posts.

[MyTurn2Raise]

Im beginning to think I should invest in party poker

[IndieMatty]

Always. right.