#1
|
|||
|
|||
The best argument for energy research in existance. Smart cars....
My brother just came back from Europe and saw a bunch of these on the autobahn. Amazingly this guy goes 82 mph and still manages to have a decent safety rating. I'm not sure I would trust it though. No crumple zones [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] See the rest here at thesmart.co.uk This one is kind of cool though. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The best argument for energy research in existance. Smart cars....
[ QUOTE ]
Amazingly this guy goes 82 mph and still manages to have a decent safety rating. [/ QUOTE ] 82mph top speed? That blows. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The best argument for energy research in existance. Smart cars....
I'm a fan of energy-efficient cars that don't look like they're trying to look futuristic. Put a freakin' normal looking body on the damned things.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The best argument for energy research in existance. Smart cars....
[ QUOTE ]
See the rest here at thesmart.co.uk This one is kind of cool though. [/ QUOTE ] definately not cool...maybe for midgets |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The best argument for energy research in existance. Smart cars....
I agree. However, it's not the easiest thing to do when the car isn't much bigger than a crotch rocket. On the other hand I think the roadster is that bad lookin. I'm just not sure I would fit in it. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The best argument for energy research in existance. Smart cars....
damn, that roadster looks like my RX8!
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The best argument for energy research in existance. Smart cars....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Amazingly this guy goes 82 mph and still manages to have a decent safety rating. [/ QUOTE ] 82mph top speed? That blows. [/ QUOTE ] Would you really call 82 mph slow if you were sitting inside of a car not much bigger than you were? Also, how often do you drive faster than 82 mph? Just curious. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The best argument for energy research in existance. Smart cars....
[ QUOTE ]
damn, that roadster looks like my RX8! [/ QUOTE ] I was thinking more like a jacked up S2000. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The best argument for energy research in existance. Smart cars....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Amazingly this guy goes 82 mph and still manages to have a decent safety rating. [/ QUOTE ] 82mph top speed? That blows. [/ QUOTE ] Would you really call 82 mph slow if you were sitting inside of a car not much bigger than you were? Also, how often do you drive faster than 82 mph? Just curious. [/ QUOTE ] It's not that I need to go faster than 82mph (although I actually do somewhat often - every time I go to the airport or drive somewhere outside of town), but more that it's an indication of a very slow 0-60 time, which blows. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The best argument for energy research in existance. Smart cars....
Well the roadster goes 110 and has a 0-62.9 of 10.9 seconds. Which isn't too bad.
The shitbox has a 0-60 of 18.3 seconds... which blows. This is the reason why I titled the thread the way I did. |
|
|