Split the NL forums again?

[soah]

Seems there are now six different forums for limit hold'em, while NL has only two, and they are both pretty crowded.

Small NL: .5/1 and lower (and 1/2 live games?)
Mid NL: 1/2 - 3/6
High NL: 5/10 and above

Or should we attempt to subdivide somehow by shorthanded vs full? Full games online seem to exist mostly only at the small stakes and 10/20 at Party, while short games exist at all limits, so perhaps something like:

Small SH NL: .5/1 and lower
Mid SH NL: 1/2 - 3/6
High SH NL: 5/10 and higher
Small-Mid Full NL: 3/6 and lower
High Full NL: 5/10 and higher

Any thoughts?

[fsuplayer]

i think the forum structure is pretty good as is.

[bkholdem]

All the players in the lower end of 'high stakes' want to price themselves in the high stakes forum (5/10 i.e. "the current structure is fine") while not caring at all that 2/4 mid limit players and players trying to make a transition to higher stakes are getting the shaft since there are like 3-4 people in the small stakes that can give relevant advice to them lol

Games go to 100/200 and a bit of 200/400 online right? Why does 5/10 fit in with them?

People have presented reasonable arguments why there should be seperation. Saying you don't think it needs seperation and saying the thread doesn't belong here speaks a lot more to your ego than it does to your intellect.

[bkholdem]

And another thing.. lol

Why are so many 5/10 and 10/20 players sucking kane's a$$ right now and what does that tell us that might be relevant in this thread? haha

[patrick_mcmurray]

Why not have 6 NL forums

Small 6 max and full
Mid ""
High""

[Prevaricator]

[ QUOTE ]
i think the forum structure is pretty good as is.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you should put this in the "forum suggestions" forum

It is located on the sidebar, below OOT.

[soah]

[ QUOTE ]
I think you should put this in the "forum suggestions" forum

It is located on the sidebar, below OOT.

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess that's new too.

I'll just wait for AZK to move this thread instead of posting a second one.

[captZEEbo1]

I think this wold be pretty good:

Small NL: .5/1 and lower (and 1/2 live games?)
Mid NL: 1/2 - 3/6
High NL: 5/10 and above


The problem with separating shorthanded and full...it doesn't make as much sense for NL, since most posters here play both and oftentimes the situation doesn't even matter too much if it's full or short (I open raised from CO and BB calls....)

[soah]

[ QUOTE ]
I think this wold be pretty good:

Small NL: .5/1 and lower (and 1/2 live games?)
Mid NL: 1/2 - 3/6
High NL: 5/10 and above


The problem with separating shorthanded and full...it doesn't make as much sense for NL, since most posters here play both and oftentimes the situation doesn't even matter too much if it's full or short (I open raised from CO and BB calls....)

[/ QUOTE ]

I also considered the same thing with regards to sh vs full. But the games do attract different types of players, especially at the smaller stakes where the full ring games are incredibly weak-tight while the 6-max games are filled with maniacs and loose-passives.