#1
|
|||
|
|||
4,000 hands...losing
is this considered a small sample?
at what point would a winning player most certainly be ahead?? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4,000 hands...losing
somewhere around eleventy gazillion you should feel pretty good
i lost 150 bets in 5000 hands over the weekend, but i suck |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4,000 hands...losing
4000 hands is absolutely nothing. I have had a breakeven streak of over 30k hands.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4,000 hands...losing
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4,000 hands...losing
Please grow up a little bit and use the search function before posting. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4,000 hands...losing
That seems to be fairly significant. You need to present some data SUPPORTING your hypothesis that 4000 hands is nothing.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4,000 hands...losing
Ouch, just ouch....
I'd probably give up poker, the scary thing is how consistent the downswing is. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4,000 hands...losing
Usually a winning player should be up after about 100 hands.
Check out my .50-1 six max numbers. 1306 hands 109.5 BB won 8.38 BB per 100 Im sweet |
|
|