Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-29-2005, 01:38 AM
RED FACE RED FACE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 125
Default 100NL full: Overpair vs semi-shortstacked and loose-bad opponent...

No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (10 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

MP2 ($81.00)
MP3 ($101.00)
CO ($53.00)
Button ($92.00)
SB ($114.00)
BB ($41.00)
UTG ($87.00)
UTG+1 ($83.00)
Hero ($101.00)
MP1 ($158.00)

Preflop: Hero is UTG+2 with K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $0.50.
UTG calls $1, UTG+1 calls $1, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $6</font>, <font color="#666666">7 folds</font>, UTG calls $5, UTG+1 calls $5.

Flop: ($19.50) 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $18</font>, UTG folds, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 raises to $36</font>.

Final Pot: $73.50

Normally I don't bet this large but the table was loose.

I think there is no room to communicate that I have an overpair instead of cont betting so if I continue it will be for my entire stack - agree?

He could have trips or better or AT, JJ, QQ, TT or maybe a draw but I wasn't thinking draw.

Does the fact that this was a check-raise indicate he's not on JJ or QQ or maybe even AT(tho I think AT is more likely to cr than JJ or QQ for reasons I can't explain).

Most importantly, is this a pretty easy/auto-fold?

I always make notes on people who lose their stack w an overpair: I'd hate to make notes on myself.

thanks a lot
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-29-2005, 02:06 AM
DJ Sensei DJ Sensei is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 148
Default Re: 100NL full: Overpair vs semi-shortstacked and loose-bad opponent...

Call, raise turn all-in. (Unless its an A, and he pushes ahead of you... then fold angrily) If he has AT, a 3-bet could scare him off. I don't think we can fold this against a loose-bad opponent, and i think JJ is definitely in his range here. loose-bad opponents love overpairs.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-29-2005, 02:07 AM
deaders deaders is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 70
Default Re: 100NL full: Overpair vs semi-shortstacked and loose-bad opponent...

If he is definitely loose and bad then call the raise and play it from there. Check turn if he checks, you may want fold if he makes a medium/big bet on the turn, dont know how good this is though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-29-2005, 02:52 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 100NL full: Overpair vs semi-shortstacked and loose-bad opponent..

With the game as loose as you say, I think you have to play it for your entire stack if that's what it comes down to. A lot of loose players love paired flops like that and see them as a great bluffing opportunity. I think if he had caught trips or a boat, he probably would have just check-called, trying to induce a bigger bet from you on the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-29-2005, 04:57 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 100NL full: Overpair vs semi-shortstacked and loose-bad opponent..

vs loose and bad opponent....

errr, all in?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-29-2005, 10:32 AM
RED FACE RED FACE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 125
Default Re: 100NL full: Overpair vs semi-shortstacked and loose-bad opponent..

Thanks all. I lost stack to 68s by 3betting all in.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.