Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-14-2005, 11:55 AM
Andrew Fletcher Andrew Fletcher is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 0
Default Re: putting a live hand together

For a small stakes player like me, this post is pure gold.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-14-2005, 12:33 PM
DrSavage DrSavage is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 634
Default Re: putting a live hand together

[ QUOTE ]
Nah, he doesn't have a pair, BK was sure of it.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think they are talking about mike l hand now.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-14-2005, 04:04 PM
lil feller lil feller is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 66
Default Re: putting a live hand together

Hi BK,

Good read. As I was reading your post I was reminded of a Clark post a while back, advocating that if you think you should call the river w/ K-high, you might be better off raising. How do you think this link applies to your hand, or does it at all?

thanks,

lf
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-14-2005, 04:56 PM
bernie bernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: seattle!!!__ too sunny to be in a cardroom....ahhh, one more hand
Posts: 3,752
Default Re: putting a live hand together

[ QUOTE ]
Hi BK,

Good read. As I was reading your post I was reminded of a Clark post a while back, advocating that if you think you should call the river w/ K-high, you might be better off raising. How do you think this link applies to your hand, or does it at all?

thanks,

lf

[/ QUOTE ]

That thread came to mind for me too.

b
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-18-2005, 07:06 AM
NLSoldier NLSoldier is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 91
Default Re: putting a live hand together

[ QUOTE ]
Hi BK,

Good read. As I was reading your post I was reminded of a Clark post a while back, advocating that if you think you should call the river w/ K-high, you might be better off raising. How do you think this link applies to your hand, or does it at all?

thanks,

lf

[/ QUOTE ]

Thats an interesting thought, but I think the metagame effects of calling someone down with King high (especially live) are too great to make it correct.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-18-2005, 11:40 AM
sthief09 sthief09 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem (mets are 9-13, currently on a 1 game winning streak)
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: putting a live hand together

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hi BK,

Good read. As I was reading your post I was reminded of a Clark post a while back, advocating that if you think you should call the river w/ K-high, you might be better off raising. How do you think this link applies to your hand, or does it at all?

thanks,

lf

[/ QUOTE ]

Thats an interesting thought, but I think the metagame effects of calling someone down with King high (especially live) are too great to make it correct.

[/ QUOTE ]


this reminds me of last week when i tried to bluff a TAG with QJ-high on an unpaired board and it turned out to be the best value bet of my life. no one folds A high HU ever online
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-18-2005, 04:12 PM
mikelow mikelow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,707
Default Re: putting a live hand together

nice read
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.