Doh!!!

[sam h]

[ QUOTE ]
So in other words, we have a bounty on a guy whose name we know, but whose prints and picture we might not have, or at least not enough of a good such record to make a quick idenitity, and then we release them in a week or two.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think his picture is up all over Iraq. It was Iraqi security forces who detained him, not Americann troops.

[ QUOTE ]
But you libs STILL get to bash the administration for not identifying him in that artifical time frame.

[/ QUOTE ]

I pointed out that if the Iraqis couldn't identify the most wanted terrorist in the country, we were in trouble. It says something about how difficult the job is over there, and also probably about the training/abilities of the Iraqi security forces. Do you doubt this?

[ QUOTE ]
And of course if the administration holds the guy too long, then you bash them for that too! So you get to bash Bush no matter what the outcome. Man ain't that great.

[/ QUOTE ]

Let me repeat what I said before. If you have evidence that somebody committed a crime, then holding them shouldn't be a problem. If you don't, then that person shouldn't be in custody for an extended period. As I said before, the question is really what constitutes evidence.

Try to listen to what other people say on this board, not what you want them to have said for "point scoring" purposes.