Its official, PV is now for sale

[ZimbuTheMonkey]

For a plugin of Pokertracker which costs 55 bucks, it should be a MAX of 15$. I mean, c'mon, all it does is takes the stats that pokertracker collects and processes with thousands and thousands of hands and just displays them on the tables...

[wbrumfiel]

I could never get PV to work, guess now I have a reason not to try. Seriously though, $20-$25 I MIGHT have paid but $50, no way. Especially if I can get basically the same thing for free.

[iluzion]

[ QUOTE ]
I hope you will see that
PlayerView really is worth the price and change your mind, however I am
not going to budge on this issue.

[/ QUOTE ]

I emailed them trying to say its outrageous to charge 90% of the price for an ad-on and thats part of what I got in return.

[brazilio]

1. Use .NET
2. ...
3. Profit

THE LINK HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED

[SlyGuy]

[ QUOTE ]
1. Use .NET
2. ...
3. Profit

THE LINK HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED

[/ QUOTE ]

Does this look like slashdot to you?

[goodguy_1]

The reality is that Pat has underpriced PokerTracker for a long time.PokerTracker should cost at least $100 for all that it does.$50 for PV ..I will pay it without a qualm.Is $50 a little pricey for what it does..no way!PV is a great tool as long as it's still allowed.

The problem is u guys are using PT as a reference on cost.PT should cost $150-200 and PV's $50 would be inline with that.PV also kicks ass on GT imo so comparing the 2 doesnt cut it.I use GT on rooms where PV wont work.I woulnt be surprised to see PT priced higher sometime soon as well.

[xLukex]

[ QUOTE ]
The reality is that Pat has underpriced PokerTracker for a long time.PokerTracker should cost at least $100 for all that it does.$50 for PV ..I will pay it without a qualm.Is $50 a little pricey for what it does..no way!PV is a great tool as long as it's still allowed.

The problem is u guys are using PT as a reference on cost.PT should cost $150-200 and PV's $50 would be inline with that.PV also kicks ass on GT imo so comparing the 2 doesnt cut it.I use GT on rooms where PV wont work.I woulnt be surprised to see PT priced higher sometime soon as well.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why do you consider Playerview better than GameTime? I've only used Gametime, but it seems pretty standard.

I also have Pokeroffice, so I sometimes use that for it's live features.

[SackUp]

Ya $50 sounds a bit steep to me. I think $25 at the very most. For $50 I'm going to switch over to Pokeroffice which gives you all the same live stats and it gives you pot odds and hand details as well. More bang for your buck if you ask me. Too bad as I really liked PV. Not a very smart move economically if you ask me. He could had made a killing at 15-25 a pop.

[brazilio]

Well, I'd tell you what it looks like, but playerview locked up and I don't have stats on you.

[Yobz]

[ QUOTE ]

I also have Pokeroffice, so I sometimes use that for it's live features.

[/ QUOTE ]

Email I got from party when I asked them about pokeroffice:

[ QUOTE ]

PokerOffice not recommended [#2803605]

support@partypoker.com to me

Dear Kevin,

Thank you for contacting us.

This is to inform you that we at PartyPoker do not allow our players to use the third party software on our tables. Please understand that the usage of such software is not recommended. External software applications are often not accredited from a software security point of view.

We value your association with us and we hope that you keep having a great time at our tables.

If you have any questions or suggestions, please do not hesitate to contact our Customer Care Department at any time. We are here 24/7 to assist you via email.

Thank you for choosing us as your online gaming site!

Rupa
Poker Customer Care

--Original Message--
Date: 2005-04-23 22:03
To: support@partypoker.com
Subject: Question about software[#2803605]

Hi,

I recently visited pokeroffice.com and was looking at the software. I
was wondering whether you allow this software to be used?

Thanks,
Kevin


[/ QUOTE ]