Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-20-2005, 05:31 PM
Eihli Eihli is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 363
Default Re: I got cheated by Ultimate Bet in their last promotion :(

Fact: No good player has ever lost $1500.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-20-2005, 05:33 PM
wbrumfiel wbrumfiel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 265
Default Re: I got cheated by Ultimate Bet in their last promotion :(

Wow, the hits just keep comin. Did I say that either?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-20-2005, 05:40 PM
keikiwai keikiwai is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 228
Default Re: I got cheated by Ultimate Bet in their last promotion :(

So a $100/$200 LHE player never had a 75BB losing streak?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-20-2005, 05:44 PM
wbrumfiel wbrumfiel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 265
Default Re: I got cheated by Ultimate Bet in their last promotion :(

[ QUOTE ]
So a $100/$200 LHE player never had a 75BB losing streak?

[/ QUOTE ]
Um, try 7.5BB. It was a freaking joke people, get over yourselves. I make 1 joke and all of a sudden I am a shitty poster? Besides, the OP never even said what limit he played. $1500 could be 7.5BB, could be 75BB, could be 750BB (although very doubtful). Irregardless, it was still just a damn joke.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-20-2005, 05:47 PM
moondogg moondogg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 145
Default Re: I got cheated by Ultimate Bet in their last promotion :(

[ QUOTE ]
Irregardless, it was still just a damn joke.

[/ QUOTE ]

Irregardless

[ QUOTE ]
Usage Note: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.