Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-01-2005, 05:04 PM
mike l. mike l. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: oceanside, california
Posts: 2,212
Default Re: The Peter Rus rule

"There is a Sklansky thread where he advocates the same thing with 73s"

that's if youre all in preflop.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-01-2005, 05:06 PM
mike l. mike l. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: oceanside, california
Posts: 2,212
Default Re: The Peter Rus rule

if i recall correctly the 73s call is if you are going all in preflop.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-01-2005, 05:47 PM
Glenn Glenn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 730
Default Re: The Peter Rus rule

FWIW I defend with a ton of hands HU and anything suited 4 way but I play a little tighter 3 way. It's a tough spot to play low pairs out of position against mulitple opponents even if you do play expertly.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-01-2005, 07:15 PM
rory rory is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 29
Default Re: The Peter Rus rule

What if you only had 1 BB left in your stack? What about 1.5 BB? 2 BB? What would be the worst amount of BB to have left in your stack?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-01-2005, 07:29 PM
Jeff W Jeff W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 85
Default Re: The Peter Rus rule

[ QUOTE ]
if i recall correctly the 73s call is if you are going all in preflop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Getting 5.5:1 odds on an all-in call, I think it's correct to call any 2:

equity (%)
15.9 { 72o }
48.1 { 88+, ATs+, KJs+, AJo+, KQo }
36.0 { TT-77, AJs-ATs, KTs+, QTs+, JTs, AQo }

Getting 5.5:1 odds on an all-in, we need 15.4% equity. Rake might make 72o barely unprofitable. This illustrates the power of having a short stack.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-01-2005, 07:31 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: The Peter Rus rule

I think it's correct if you play well. Also it depends on the blind structure, but for general purposes it would be correct if you played "expertly"


Tex
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-03-2005, 06:36 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: The Peter Rus rule

Hi Baron,

With a raiser and 2 cold callers it would be 4 to the flop. 3 to the flop is the original rule.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-03-2005, 08:34 PM
baronzeus baronzeus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Palo Alto, CA/Bay101
Posts: 2,675
Default Re: The Peter Rus rule

[ QUOTE ]
Hi Baron,

With a raiser and 2 cold callers it would be 4 to the flop. 3 to the flop is the original rule.

[/ QUOTE ]

yes, that is what i filtered for (3 to the flop). 4 to the flop is slightly better but only .02BB/hand
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.