OT: My gay blog.

[johnnybeef]

[ QUOTE ]
First off, I'm sorry you people dont like some of the greatest music in the world. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I'll change it to some different music i'm sure no one will like.

As for why I decided to do $55s instead of $109s, I figured i'd do maybe 1000 $55s or so 12-20 tabling just to see what kind of results to expect. If I can pull 20% roi in the $55s, I will stay there as I can only get 10% in the %109s. As for how many hours I play, I dont have a set time that I play daily or anything like that. I just play when I feel like it.

[/ QUOTE ]

while i think that you would be able to do 20% 4 tabling and maybe (a big maybe) 8 tabling, i would be willing to put any amount of money that you will not be able to attain 20% 12 tabling.

[Messy_Jesse]

[ QUOTE ]

while i think that you would be able to do 20% 4 tabling and maybe (a big maybe) 8 tabling, i would be willing to put any amount of money that you will not be able to attain 20% 12 tabling

[/ QUOTE ]

I think its definitely feasible that you could get 20% 12-tabling. 20% 8-tabling is certainly good at the 55s, but I think that there are a decent number of players who have done this over large sample sizes.

[axeshigh]

[ QUOTE ]

I think its definitely feasible that you could get 20% 12-tabling. 20% 8-tabling is certainly good at the 55s, but I think that there are a decent number of players who have done this over large sample sizes.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ditto.

[Sponger15SB]

[ QUOTE ]
I think its definitely feasible that you could get 20% 12-tabling. 20% 8-tabling is certainly good at the 55s, but I think that there are a decent number of players who have done this over large sample sizes.

[/ QUOTE ]

Eh, I doubt it. If I was making 20% I wouldn't be there for long.

There is a big difference between have and could. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[citanul]

i agree with sponger.

citanul

[axeshigh]

So you guys think anyone that gets 20% at the 50s 8-tabling can necessarily get more than 10% at the 100s, same amount of tables?

[Moonsugar]

I do.

I haven't 8 tabled very much, so most of my results are 3-6 tabling. I have 18% ROI at 55s with over 5000 played and 12% at 109 with over 2000 played. I make lots of mistakes but the more I play and improve (I think I am improving, at least) the more I think that I can't really get 'that' much better results. I guess you have to be some sort of poker god like zee or giga or curtains to get these crazy roi numbers. I just don't think I can do it.

Also, 8 tabling the 109 or 215 is really really hard for me. I just don't see how people do it or 12 table with high roi numbers (>10%). Numbers around 20% like zeejustin talks about just blow me away.

[Newt_Buggs]

zeejustin was 8 tabeling in his last SNG goal I think

[Messy_Jesse]

Myself and Myst, as he goes on here, are the only two players I know enough to comment on their stats. Each of us 8-table the 55s, and each have very close to a 20% ROI over atleast 2000 55s. The 109s, as even FieryJustice mentioned, are more difficult to get a comparable hourly rate at. The variance is much more of a bitch, the donks fewer and farther between, and the difficulty level is just generally higher. Thus, a lot of players who are 8-tabling the 55s with a 20% ROI stay there. I promise that Myst and I aren't the only ones; a few other players I know have similar ROIs 8-tabling, though I don't know their specific stats.

[microbet]

Ilya, are you Joshua? If so, Dude, you are an animal.

I followed some of those blogs. Man, I'm old. I can't believe there are so many bands I've never heard of.

Where's Zeppelin, man?