#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Genious laydown or retarded play?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm surprised nobody gave any consideration to the push being an isolation raise. First raiser was short stacked. [/ QUOTE ] There's something wrong with the chip stacks. CO covers the first raiser by only 300 chips according to the initial chip count, but magically seems to cover the first raiser by 700 chips in the flop action. [/ QUOTE ] Yep, the MP goes from 700-sump'n at the start, calls only 65 preflop, and then only has 300-sump'n left for the all-in-ski on the flop. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Genious laydown or retarded play?
Easy fold
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Genious laydown or retarded play?
The converter didnt work so I did some of it manually. Obviously Im retarded at math.
He went all in for 665, I apologize. -Chris |
|
|