|
|
#13
09-26-2005, 05:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: poker sites \"juicing\" the game
The poorly player loses in general to average players and other poor players, and highly rated players too ... (but once in a while gets a "bonus") where he wins slightly more often than he should.
Of course people take money from the sites, if not then the sites would cease to exist. However, as you know by design, less money comes out of the site than goes in. It is all a question of how much. 
|
|
#15
09-26-2005, 05:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: poker sites \"juicing\" the game
[ QUOTE ]
I find it kind of scary that nobody even remains open minded about this. [/ QUOTE ] Those of us who have played long enough, and have both good statistics and track records, don't have to be "open minded" about this. We have indisputible facts that answer this question for us. There simply is no dispute. There are no facts to back up the rigging theory.
|
|
#16
09-26-2005, 06:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: poker sites \"juicing\" the game
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Reged: 08/18/05 Posts: 1 [/ QUOTE ] Best part is they waited a month to ask [/ QUOTE ] You gotta know when to pick your spots. Barron Vangor Toth BarronVangorToth.com
|
|
#17
09-26-2005, 06:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: poker sites \"juicing\" the game
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I find it kind of scary that nobody even remains open minded about this. [/ QUOTE ] Those of us who have played long enough, and have both good statistics and track records, don't have to be "open minded" about this. We have indisputible facts that answer this question for us. There simply is no dispute. There are no facts to back up the rigging theory. [/ QUOTE ] exactly
|
|
#19
09-26-2005, 06:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: poker sites \"juicing\" the game
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I find it kind of scary that nobody even remains open minded about this. [/ QUOTE ] Those of us who have played long enough, and have both good statistics and track records, don't have to be "open minded" about this. We have indisputible facts that answer this question for us. There simply is no dispute. There are no facts to back up the rigging theory. [/ QUOTE ] So you can quickly give me your win % heads up with a hand you have dominated over a sample size of say, 250k+ hands?
|
|
#20
09-26-2005, 06:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: poker sites \"juicing\" the game
[ QUOTE ]
This is a logical argument. It is extremely difficult to prove. [/ QUOTE ] This is a specious conspiracy theory. It is impossible to prove. There have been many posts here by people with large database of online results. Every one of them has shown that the results are in line with statistical expectations. No one have ever provided any data here showing online results that are statistically improbable. It is impossible to prove a negative proposition, such as online poker is not rigged. It is logically simple to prove a positive proposition, such as online poker is rigged. All it takes is a single example. No one has ever provided one. Your "logical argument" is as strong as any other evidence ever provided to show that online poker is rigged. That is to say, idle speculation of no value.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
