|
|
#13
10-16-2005, 04:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Atl @ NO
LOCK IT UP!
|
|
#14
10-16-2005, 04:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Atl @ NO
[ QUOTE ]
I just wanted to point out that the Saints suck and there is no way they cover 4.5, so I'm betting my life savings on the game. Because it's a LOCK. [/ QUOTE ] LOCK IT UP!!!!11111!!ONE!!
|
|
#15
10-16-2005, 04:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Atl @ NO
[ QUOTE ]
LOL atl misses fieldgoal with 6 secs left, trivial def holding penalty and they get another kick and win it [/ QUOTE ] how do you get def. holding on a fg? anyone?
|
|
#17
10-16-2005, 04:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Atl @ NO
[ QUOTE ]
I'm guessing a Saints lineman held one or more Falcons linemen to allow a teammate to get through the line. I've seen it called before but not very often. [/ QUOTE ] That's exactly what happened. No bearing on the play whatsoever...
|
|
#18
10-16-2005, 04:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Atl @ NO
[ QUOTE ]
I'm guessing a Saints lineman held one or more Falcons linemen to allow a teammate to get through the line. I've seen it called before but not very often. [/ QUOTE ] Correct. Completely absurd 3 hours. Brooks played a great game aside from the 2nd half INT.
|
|
#19
10-16-2005, 04:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Atl @ NO
[ QUOTE ]
how do you get def. holding on a fg? anyone? [/ QUOTE ] Crooked refereeing?
|
|
#20
10-16-2005, 04:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Atl @ NO
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] how do you get def. holding on a fg? anyone? [/ QUOTE ] Crooked refereeing? [/ QUOTE ] The two worst calls in this game, by far, were the bogus Off. PI on Hakim and the defensive holding call on the FG. Take those away and you have NO 38-24. In fact, you wouldn't have had an opportunity for the end of game FG because Vick et al would be trying to make it 38-31. When I said this was an *absurd* three hours in San Antonio, I meant it. At least I got the freakin cover.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
