Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-04-2005, 11:13 PM
NegativeEV NegativeEV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 118
Default Re: Discounting Outs

[ QUOTE ]
You have 2 . Only 11 left in the deck. Chances of any player being dealt two is about 4.5%. And there are only 5 other players in the hand. The fact that they are in the hand does not signifcantly raise the chances that they are holding suited cards since people limp w/ a lot of different cards than suited.

[/ QUOTE ]

Your math using 11/52 to get the 4.5% seems flawed. You can see 5 cards so I think 11/47 is more appropriate as your starting point. Not a big change, but when you run the math all the way through (1-(1-.054)^5))) it looks like the math tells you there is a ~ 24% chance someone else has a flush draw.

Now 24% based only on the math tells you that another flush draw is unlikely, HOWEVER, you have other information to work with given the flop action (i.e. min bet, raise, re-raise), and I think the flop action should indicate that a flush draw is fairly likely.

Short story- math and likely limp hands tell me another flush draw is unlikely. Longer story- flop action (better indicator of holdings) tells me a flush draw is fairly likely.

I would discount to 7-8 outs for purposes of analyzing pot size and would generally fold with the 3:1 pot. I would assess hero's folding equity at close to zero in this circumstance at a low limit SnG.

EDIT: note- the math flaw only changes the 4.5% to 5.4% which would only change the likelihood of another flush draw from 21% to 24%, thus not a big difference. The real KEY is the betting pattern and information gained on the flop which tells HERO that the flush draw may be in trouble.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-04-2005, 11:21 PM
RobbyRockets RobbyRockets is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: Discounting Outs

Well, eat your words if you must. For me, it was a very informative post. Here's why:

1. a common question (it's happened to me)
2. an assumption
3. counter of poker theory
4. then research
5. and the proof

IMO, well done.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-05-2005, 12:09 AM
texasrattlers texasrattlers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 228
Default Re: Discounting Outs

Yep, I forgot about the 3 board cards in coming up w/ my calcs. However, 2 of them are [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], which makes the liklihood of any single player holding two [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] even less (3.3%).

Just as importantly, I think the scenario that Scuba came up with for your opponents hands (KK, 88) is more likely. The betting pattern does not seem to indicate other flush draws.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-05-2005, 07:06 AM
mart_ph mart_ph is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 72
Default Re: Discounting Outs

[ QUOTE ]
But I find it severely detrimental to post general 'advice' saying this is a hand to fold PF.

[/ QUOTE ]

I may only be a beginner in most eyes, but I'm yet to read any tournament articles, or postings on this group which say that this hand is not a hand to fold EARLY in an sng. I know it's in the SB, but I was merely recounting what i have learnt from other sources as well as this forum.

Sorry if you think this is detrimental.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-05-2005, 08:28 AM
scooby scooby is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 112
Default Re: Discounting Outs

omigosh...the advice earlier was absolutely terrible. Call preflop 100% of the time. If you can't play this hand in a multiway pot, stop playing poker. Then, you can either lead out and then push all in over a raise, or just checkraise big. The *ONLY* time you're in trouble is if you get called by a bigger flush draw and a set...hence the push to get a slightly bigger flush draw to fold You don't give a lickety split if AA or KK is out there and limped for some reason. Against only one caller, you're only worried about a set, and still that's about 58-42. Dead money. Lastly, this is not a bad beat. In a multiway pot, as long as you get the other flush draws out, you're fine:

Result
http://twodimes.net/h/?z=694973
pokenum -h 9h 9s - 4d 5d - 7c 9c -- 3c 6d 8d
Holdem Hi: 903 enumerated boards containing 3c 8d 6d
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
9s 9h 240 26.58 651 72.09 12 1.33 0.272
5d 4d 452 50.06 451 49.94 0 0.00 0.501
9c 7c 199 22.04 692 76.63 12 1.33 0.227

The problem comes when you allow a hand like j [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] t [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] to come along. So push to get it out:

http://twodimes.net/h/?z=694974
pokenum -h 9h 9s - 4d 5d - 7c 9c - jd td -- 3c 6d 8d
Holdem Hi: 820 enumerated boards containing 3c 8d 6d
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
9s 9h 183 22.32 625 76.22 12 1.46 0.230
5d 4d 161 19.63 659 80.37 0 0.00 0.196
9c 7c 199 24.27 609 74.27 12 1.46 0.250
Jd Td 265 32.32 555 67.68 0 0.00 0.323
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.