Aggression Factor

tree_stump · #1 12-31-2005, 04:42 AM

I'm somewhere around 22/9/4.8 (w/o PF)

I'm amazed I still get calls at NL50, but they love to do it!

But at any rate, my aggression number is so high because of cbets, raises I like to make with draws or TP, semi-bluff 2 barrel bets, that stuff.

ajmargarine · #2 12-31-2005, 04:49 AM

Hmmm. I've always considered myself to be aggressive, you know, the whole TAG bit. But both you guys who mentioned your number are 4's, and my 2.7 looks mild by comparison.

tree_stump · #3 12-31-2005, 04:51 AM

Dunno... Part of it may be short term luck - two years ago the first responses from this forum would have been:

Sample size is too small. Come back in 100k hands.

EDIT: Another thing to note is that, when I compiled the majority of these numbers, I was playing a style heavily influenced by Super System, and it basically entailed picking on players who didn't seem to have the intestinal fortitude for big bet poker. Worked awesome for my wallet, but volatility was through the roof. Now I'm working on tweaking my style to get volatility down (even though I think I'll be sacrificing win rate), and those numbers will undoubtedly fall some.

2PAUL2 · #4 12-31-2005, 08:14 AM

my numbers over 4 as well but like me i suspect the 2 op's play 6 max mainly, an i think you play full ring mainly?

im pretty sure there would be a difference in the two. i know my turn number would be much lower for full bcos im more likely to call/check for pot control. in 6 max im more likely to bet/raise bcos im happy against alot of players playing big pots with overpair/tptk/low 2 pair.

that was a bit rambly but may give some idea why your number is a tad lower.

paul

scrapperdog · #5 12-31-2005, 11:13 AM

My post flop agression is 1.46 (up from 1.24 since I posted my pt stats and u guys told me to be more agressive). I think anything over 2 is pretty agressive.

There is no perfect number. If someone has a low agression factor and comes out firing then beware.