Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-27-2005, 09:13 PM
jacki jacki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 135
Default Lamont Jordan, Fred Taylor, or a rookie?

16-team keeper league.
2 keepers.
We have Tiki Barber and Mike Vick. (Don't ask, taking over an already existing team)

We have the #2 overall pick.
Among those available, who would you take?

Fred Taylor
LaMont Jordan
Cadillac Williams
Ronnie Brown
Cedric Benson
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-27-2005, 09:15 PM
MarkL444 MarkL444 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: East Lansing, MI
Posts: 548
Default Re: Lamont Jordan, Fred Taylor, or a rookie?

fred taylor would be a terrible pick imo
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-27-2005, 09:19 PM
CD56 CD56 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 114
Default Re: Lamont Jordan, Fred Taylor, or a rookie?

since it's a keeper league Freddy T is out, personally i'd lean towards Lamont, i think the oakland offense is going to be pretty good for the next couple of years, if you want one of the rookies i think ronnie brown is the pick
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-27-2005, 09:21 PM
jacki jacki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 135
Default Re: Lamont Jordan, Fred Taylor, or a rookie?

yeah. but he wasn't that hurt last year.


[img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-27-2005, 09:25 PM
CD56 CD56 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 114
Default Re: Lamont Jordan, Fred Taylor, or a rookie?

[ QUOTE ]
yeah. but he wasn't that hurt last year.


[img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
and he still only had 2 tds....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-27-2005, 09:53 PM
The Armchair The Armchair is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Big Apple
Posts: 251
Default Re: Lamont Jordan, Fred Taylor, or a rookie?

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-27-2005, 10:03 PM
jacki jacki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 135
Default Re: Lamont Jordan, Fred Taylor, or a rookie?

[ QUOTE ]


[/ QUOTE ]

We have one vote for Mr. Williams
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-27-2005, 10:06 PM
The Armchair The Armchair is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Big Apple
Posts: 251
Default Re: Lamont Jordan, Fred Taylor, or a rookie?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


[/ QUOTE ]

We have one vote for Mr. Williams

[/ QUOTE ]

I even matched the colors. Couldn't find FL plates, though.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-27-2005, 10:41 PM
Michael Davis Michael Davis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 613
Default Re: Lamont Jordan, Fred Taylor, or a rookie?

With your team you should be looking towards the future. Taylor and Jordan are out for sure. I wouldn't take Benson because you still want to field a reasonably competitive team this year. Personally I'd go with Cadillac but you're just guesisng about which young guy will be the biggest stud.

-Michael
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-27-2005, 11:25 PM
yoadrians yoadrians is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 105
Default Re: Lamont Jordan, Fred Taylor, or a rookie?

[ QUOTE ]
With your team you should be looking towards the future. Taylor and Jordan are out for sure. I wouldn't take Benson because you still want to field a reasonably competitive team this year. Personally I'd go with Cadillac but you're just guesisng about which young guy will be the biggest stud.

-Michael

[/ QUOTE ]

Why would you say Jordan is out? Isn't he very young (26 maybe) on a good offense?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.