#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
[ QUOTE ]
Recently though I've been playing more like a 25/15 type game [/ QUOTE ] Me too, and I'm winning more than ever. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
Hey jhall. My PTOmaha database right now is kind of small because I lost my big one when one of my HDs went kapoot. But over my last 10k i'm actually up around 90 so quite a bit higher.
Are you pretty tight and how many hands is it? maybe we should move this to the PLO forum or PM me [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Recently though I've been playing more like a 25/15 type game [/ QUOTE ] Me too, and I'm winning more than ever. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah more raising (and specifically, more REraising) and more hands in position and my WR has jumped up noticeably. Imagine that! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
We are experimenting with exactly the same things then. I reraise more in position, raise limpers more, and raise out of the blinds more. All 3 are working very nicely.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
43
paul |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
48 ptbb/100
Only 6k hands |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
to late to edit but over 17k hands if the size of the database was important to you.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
41 ptbb/100 over 18,000 hands.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
31.4/100 hands over 18k hands
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard deviation at 6 max
SD = 68/100 over 60k hands
|
|
|