Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-07-2005, 01:56 PM
theweatherman theweatherman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 82
Default Re: I guess it\'s time to get it all in -- flop bluff

umm you just reiterated my post.

Bluff = mandatory.
Over bet = bad, stupid, and a poor bluff.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-07-2005, 01:57 PM
scdavis0 scdavis0 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4
Default Re: I guess it\'s time to get it all in -- flop bluff

Can you please show me where you ever said that the bluff was mandatory?

I mean PRIOR to Ghazban saying so.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-07-2005, 02:02 PM
theweatherman theweatherman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 82
Default Re: I guess it\'s time to get it all in -- flop bluff

[ QUOTE ]
I agree that if you are planning on raising in position then you probably have to bet almost any flop (maybe not a As Ks Qs) But your over bet is ridiculous and terrible.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-07-2005, 02:03 PM
MarkD MarkD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 492
Default Re: I guess it\'s time to get it all in -- flop bluff

[ QUOTE ]
I have no problem with the raise; just the amount. I agree that the raise is mandatory.

[/ QUOTE ]

This quote, and this entire hand, makes me want to learn NL more.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-07-2005, 02:04 PM
scdavis0 scdavis0 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4
Default Re: I guess it\'s time to get it all in -- flop bluff

I will also say that the one benefit of going ahead and pushing all-in on a stone bluff is being able to advertise it.

Many of us here make overbet pushes for value but NEVER (as in absolute never ever ever) overbet pushes on bluffs. This is for good reason. Our opponents on Party certainly don't like to go to bed wondering, and those overbets for value work out great. If you are playing someone that is observant of your game at all though, you will cease to get action in these situations.

In a situation like this where the overbet bluff is only $50-60 extra in an already big pot, it may be worth it to go ahead and overbet it and show (a la Spirit Rock). It's rare and shocking to see this sort of play at a table. And people certainly do take notice. The certainly don't want to be the next guy that folds and shown 5 high.

If other players at the table are deep with you, they may not fold any piece of the board on the flop, and you can make some pretty sick value overbets with an overpair, TPTK, etc.

I had a confrontation with the same villain later on in the evening.

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (6 max, 6 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

CO ($125.15)
Button ($189.55)
Hero ($234.10)
BB ($93.60)
UTG ($14.02)
MP ($301.85)

Preflop: Hero is SB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. Hero posts a blind of $1.
<font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero (poster) raises to $7</font>, BB calls $6.

Flop: ($16) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero calls $226.10 (All-In), BB calls $85.60 (All-In).

Turn: ($327.70) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 2 all-in)</font>

River: ($327.70) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 2 all-in)</font>

Final Pot: $327.70

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
Hero has Qh Qs (flush, queen high).
BB has Ad Js (flush, jack high).
Outcome: Hero wins $327.70. </font>

This obviously isn't the best example because he only had half a buy-in. But had I for example raised an AK at this table and had the flop come A74 rainbow. I would have just gone ahead and stuck it all in on the flop for $200. People just aren't going to fold AJ there.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-07-2005, 02:10 PM
theweatherman theweatherman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 82
Default Re: I guess it\'s time to get it all in -- flop bluff

whats your party name? I can't wait to stack you.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-07-2005, 02:13 PM
scdavis0 scdavis0 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4
Default Re: I guess it\'s time to get it all in -- flop bluff

[ QUOTE ]
whats your party name? I can't wait to stack you.

[/ QUOTE ]

Send me a PM. I'll be happy to play you heads up on a private table. Please don't misinterpret this as a personal challenge, but if you think it is a +EV spot for you then let's do it. I can't imagine I'd be taking the worst of it.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-07-2005, 02:16 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: I guess it\'s time to get it all in -- flop bluff

I am not making this play against an unknown. I would need something to tell me villain is capable of laying a hand down before I bluff my stack off with 5 high. Your play looks like a bluff, maybe a club draw…If you play your monsters like this too, I see nothing wrong with it, but I would want to make sure I have some fold equity before I proceed.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-07-2005, 02:29 PM
Kyriefurro Kyriefurro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 70
Default Re: I guess it\'s time to get it all in -- flop bluff

[ QUOTE ]
I am not making this play against an unknown.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, that's the part that I don't like. There are just way too many fish out there who will call this with a draw, A high, a naked 3, etc.

You never know when villain is going to turn out to be a tricky LAG with T3. His weak flop bet just might have been a deliberate attempt to induce just this type of raise.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-07-2005, 02:29 PM
theweatherman theweatherman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 82
Default Re: I guess it\'s time to get it all in -- flop bluff

this point may have merit, but you also lose your stack when you donk it away aginst a set, two pair or any number of better hands. To me this seems to be a very limited play which may work against one or two opponents, however a good player at the table will see thorugh this and may be able to get into a situation to easily stack you.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.