Aggro Play

TheRempel · #1 09-20-2005, 11:25 PM

PokerStars Pot-Limit Omaha High, $1.00 BB (9 handed) converter

SB ($26.75)
BB ($30.15)
UTG ($102.05)
UTG+1 ($38.30)
MP1 ($100)
MP2 ($132.15)
Hero ($151.90)
CO ($89.80)
Button ($66.25)

Preflop: Hero is MP3 with 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. MP1 posts a blind of $1.
UTG calls $1, 1 fold, MP1 (poster) checks, MP2 calls $1, Hero calls $1, 1 fold, Button calls $1, SB completes, BB raises to $4, UTG calls $3, MP1 calls $3, MP2 calls $3, Hero calls $3, Button calls $3, SB calls $3.

Flop: ($28) 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (7 players)
SB folds, BB bets $5, UTG calls $5, MP1 calls $5, MP2 folds, Hero raises to $40, Button folds, BB folds, UTG folds, MP1 calls $35.

Turn: ($118) K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 players)
MP1 checks, Hero bets $60, MP1 calls $56 (All-In).

River: ($234) 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 players, 1 all-in)

Final Pot: $234

Comments?

#2 09-20-2005, 11:56 PM

I like it. Put the BB on a continuation/AAxx bet, and MP5 (who also would have suspected this) would have more than likely made the move first had he had a set.

FYI I play top-two pair the same exact way.

joewatch · #3 09-21-2005, 02:05 AM

Looks OK to me. I put MP1 on something like 9TJQ or 9TQK

Acesover8s · #4 09-21-2005, 03:06 AM

This statement:

[ QUOTE ]
Looks OK to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is completely contradictory to this statement:

[ QUOTE ]
I put MP1 on something like 9TJQ or 9TQK

[/ QUOTE ]

In regards to this hand.

You have said, "I put your opponent on a hand that completely crushes you. I think you have played well by committing all your chips against that hand"

dibbs · #5 09-21-2005, 03:35 AM

I read his post as sarcastic? I've been way off in reading sarcasm lately though.

BluffTHIS! · #6 09-21-2005, 03:45 AM

Sure aces was being sarcastic and properly so. It seems clear that MP1 has a drawing hand as well, so not only did hero get allin versus that hand on the turn with a hand likely to be dominated kicker-wise and drawing to a split, he also forfeited the power of his position and any river bluffing ability by doing so.

Tilt · #7 09-21-2005, 09:53 AM

[ QUOTE ]

You have said, "I put your opponent on a hand that completely crushes you. I think you have played well by committing all your chips against that hand"

[/ QUOTE ]

Classic.

liquid · #8 09-21-2005, 12:01 PM

Bluff, I think dibbs was telling aces that he thought joe was being sarcastic to... ah, forget it.

#9 09-21-2005, 12:24 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Bluff, I think dibbs was telling aces that he thought joe was being sarcastic to... ah, forget it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, yes, I think you are on to it. This branch is making my head spin a bit.

To me, the real question is what did MP1 have: 8-8-x-x or some type of straight draw.

It is also possible, though much less likely, that he had J-J-x-x or J-8-x-x. I know, I know, J-J-x-x should have reraised the flop and J-8-x-x should have folded on the turn, but crazier things have happened in those PL100 games. He could have been one of the crazy HE players slow-playing his set and letting our OP "trap" himself

liquid · #10 09-21-2005, 12:35 PM

MP1's call of both BB's bet and your raise is eerily reminiscent of hands where foes ended up showing me a flopped bottom/middle set. Irritating.

Is there any reason not to raise full pot on the flop? The stacks don't seem deep enough to me to make pot control a significant consideration for a turn push. Seems like any fold equity is working on the flop or not at all.