#1
|
|||
|
|||
A 7s hits 2-pair.
Villian is 35/10 after 60 hands,
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (9 handed) converter UTG+1 ($42.70) MP1 ($99) MP2 ($43.15) Hero ($98) CO ($62) Button ($94.45) SB ($45.65) BB ($165.75) UTG ($158.75) Preflop: Hero is MP3 with A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $0.50. UTG calls $1, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, MP2 calls $1, Hero calls $1, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, SB (poster) completes, BB checks. Flop: ($5) A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font> SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, MP2 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $5</font>, SB folds, BB folds, UTG calls $5, MP2 folds. Turn: ($15) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> UTG checks, Hero....? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 7s hits 2-pair.
I bet 10.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 7s hits 2-pair.
Bet. He's loose and could be calling with a variety of hands on the flop. I wouldn't worry about getting checkraised here, in fact I wouldn't mind getting checkraised here, since he may very well do it with a hand such as QT.
Dumle |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 7s hits 2-pair.
[ QUOTE ]
Flop: ($5) A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font> SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, MP2 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $5</font>, SB folds, BB folds, UTG calls $5, MP2 folds. Turn: ($15) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> UTG checks, Hero....? [/ QUOTE ] This gets interesting because of the flush draw! Normally I check behind here with two pair, hoping my opponent will make a medium-sized bet on the river that I can call. Without the flush draw, two pair is a dicey holding here because AQ and AT are likely -- and a turn c/r will make you vomit; also he might fold some garbage like A2 on the turn where it's possible that he'll bet it on the river. With the flush draw, though, I think it makes even more sense to check the turn, despite your dramatic increase in equity. Consider that AQ has you 75/25 on the turn, even with the flush draw... and you put yourself in prime shape against an unpaired ace for him to make his 2 pair on the river when you make a flush. Others may criticize this line because it doesn't maximize value against a hand like QT.. but I think you need a read to play a big pot here. I check behind on the turn. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 7s hits 2-pair.
against a tag, sure, check behind, but villain is hardly that I think.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 7s hits 2-pair.
[ QUOTE ]
I bet 10. [/ QUOTE ] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 7s hits 2-pair.
Bet and its not even close. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 7s hits 2-pair.
[ QUOTE ]
against a tag, sure, check behind, but villain is hardly that I think. [/ QUOTE ] Even so, if we're going to assume we're good, why not give him a chance to hang himself on the river... and raise for value if we so choose? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 7s hits 2-pair.
is there a good reason to check behind here?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A 7s hits 2-pair.
Value bets his nuts. Two pair and the nut flush draw. Thats ALMOST has good as an open-ended straight flush draw with two over cards, but not quite.
|
|
|