#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non-nut straight+re-draw.
no b/c you're getting 2-1 on your money.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non-nut straight+re-draw.
[ QUOTE ]
no b/c you're getting 2-1 on your money. [/ QUOTE ] Is this a typo? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non-nut straight+re-draw.
sorry i just woke up. 3 allins=300 (no?). Your share=100.
so 100/300= 33%. So if you win more than 33% of the time, this is a winning play. I know thats beneath you kongo, but this hand you really should've called, ,my flawed math be damned. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non-nut straight+re-draw.
[ QUOTE ]
I know thats beneath you kongo, but this hand you really should've called, ,my flawed math be damned. [/ QUOTE ] I think it's close, but a call is marginally correct, yes. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non-nut straight+re-draw.
either way, its a very good hand for analysis and is very difficult to actually play, gl in the future.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non-nut straight+re-draw.
What I'd like to know is why you didn't 3-bet the turn.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non-nut straight+re-draw.
[ QUOTE ]
What I'd like to know is why you didn't 3-bet the turn. [/ QUOTE ] With a re-draw, I'd rather avoid opening the action to button again. If he 4-bets all in, I am in a shitty spot. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non-nut straight+re-draw.
Not really, you call.
Ryan |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non-nut straight+re-draw.
I saw the results before I could weigh in on whether to call or fold. But this was a great hand to think about. g1, kongo.
|
|
|