Non-nut straight+re-draw. - Page 3

crosse91 · #21 09-09-2005, 06:46 PM

no b/c you're getting 2-1 on your money.

kongo_totte · #22 09-09-2005, 06:49 PM

[ QUOTE ]
no b/c you're getting 2-1 on your money.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this a typo?

crosse91 · #23 09-09-2005, 06:54 PM

sorry i just woke up. 3 allins=300 (no?). Your share=100.

so 100/300= 33%. So if you win more than 33% of the time, this is a winning play.

I know thats beneath you kongo, but this hand you really should've called, ,my flawed math be damned.

kongo_totte · #24 09-09-2005, 06:57 PM

[ QUOTE ]

I know thats beneath you kongo, but this hand you really should've called, ,my flawed math be damned.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think it's close, but a call is marginally correct, yes.

crosse91 · #25 09-09-2005, 07:00 PM

either way, its a very good hand for analysis and is very difficult to actually play, gl in the future.

ajmargarine · #26 09-09-2005, 07:58 PM

What I'd like to know is why you didn't 3-bet the turn.

kongo_totte · #27 09-09-2005, 08:55 PM

[ QUOTE ]
What I'd like to know is why you didn't 3-bet the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

With a re-draw, I'd rather avoid opening the action to button again. If he 4-bets all in, I am in a shitty spot.

ryanghall · #28 09-09-2005, 08:58 PM

Not really, you call.

Ryan

#29 09-09-2005, 11:15 PM

I saw the results before I could weigh in on whether to call or fold. But this was a great hand to think about. g1, kongo.