|
|
#21
11-08-2005, 01:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
I appreciate the response Matt. The reason I created this post was to get responses like that. Some prefer to play 4 tables and they believe this is optimal because they are still able to obsereve everything and make moves on certain opponents. I like to play 10 tables because of my style of play. Currently I am most comfortable playing super tight aggressve. I see this as a way to reduce variance as small as possible. Also, the way I view poker on PP is that the majority of times you are going to get paid off is when you are either playing a complete donk, or when you have many premium hands. The way to increase both of these variables to increase the number of tables/hands played. On any given night if I only play 4 tables I might not have many premium hands but if I would have sit at 4 different tables then I would have had a huge rush. Hopefully playing that many tables will even things out.
I just aquired the skill over time. Started with NL 100 and worked my way up. I have been playing for over 3 years now and a mechanical engineer going to law school so I believe I have some apptitude. Also, never lacking confidence or competitiveness. 
|
|
#22
11-08-2005, 01:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
[ QUOTE ]
Do you also buy in for 400 while 10 tabling? [/ QUOTE ] O man... that is funnt, but i also a solid speculation... AHAAHAAHA. GL jumpman!
|
|
#23
11-08-2005, 01:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
The answer to this question is no. I buy in for $2000. I dont understand why so many of you find this so hard to believe. I truly think it is because many people that do this probably dont post on here often. I see many players/know players who regularly play 10 tables. Not all at NL 2000 though.
This thread has turned to sh*t and hope it gets deleted. Can I request that.
|
|
#24
11-08-2005, 02:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
hi jinberg!
|
|
#26
11-08-2005, 02:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
I do see a few who say, 7 table. I mean there have been times where I've put up 7, but that is excessive. Caspis,stu,buddy,slothrop,pit,etc, are a few that I've personally seen on 6+....
|
|
#27
11-08-2005, 02:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
OMG caspis!
haha. this is him. haha.
|
|
#28
11-08-2005, 02:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
When I say 10 table it would be more accurate to say 6-7 NL 2000, 1-2 NL 1000, and the rest comprised of NL600 and 400. Sorry if it was misleading. And yes, those are the players I see every night. Just curious if any knows or has any opinions on Robisphere. Seems to play very LAG but does quite well from what i have observed. Much different style than me. Usually see him on 2 tables or so.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
