#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Classic Clarkmeister Theory?
[ QUOTE ]
This flop check is horrible. I don't care if villain is TAG. [/ QUOTE ] I disagree with this. We are WA/WB if villians 3 betting range is AA-JJ/AK. EDIT: Just saying that checking the flop is not terrible, betting is an option |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Classic Clarkmeister Theory?
[ QUOTE ]
I think I actually like the turn check. His play is pretty consistent with a whiffed AK, and even not many TAGs can resist betting an unimproved AK heads up when checked to, twice. I think he folds the turn a lot if you bet it. [/ QUOTE ] IMO villian checks behind the flop with AK or with a slowplaying a set or big overpair. I think we should bet the turn to avoid give a big [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] a free card, though I guess that depends on whether we can fold to a raise (not sure if villian would semibluff with AK with big [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Classic Clarkmeister Theory?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This flop check is horrible. I don't care if villain is TAG. [/ QUOTE ] We are WA/WB if villians 3 betting range is AA-JJ/AK. [/ QUOTE ] AK has 7 outs, more if he has a diamond or 2. not WB at all. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Classic Clarkmeister Theory?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] This flop check is horrible. I don't care if villain is TAG. [/ QUOTE ] We are WA/WB if villians 3 betting range is AA-JJ/AK. [/ QUOTE ] AK has 7 outs, more if he has a diamond or 2. not WB at all. [/ QUOTE ] Yes you are right it is not classical WA/WB (I had misread the board and didn't see the gutshot.) But is it wrong to play it the same way? Who cares about giving a free card here when we are likely behind. I guess I say this b/c what do we do if we get raised on the flop or the turn (villian could easily semibluff raise AK, especially if he has a [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Classic Clarkmeister Theory?
[ QUOTE ]
What is a clarkmeister exactly? [/ QUOTE ] Heads up, out of position, when the fourth flush card falls on the river, you should bet. Conversely, HU, with position, and facing a bet on the river if the fourth flush card falls, you should call. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Classic Clarkmeister Theory?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] This flop check is horrible. I don't care if villain is TAG. [/ QUOTE ] We are WA/WB if villians 3 betting range is AA-JJ/AK. [/ QUOTE ] AK has 7 outs, more if he has a diamond or 2. not WB at all. [/ QUOTE ] Yes you are right it is not classical WA/WB (I had misread the board and didn't see the gutshot.) But is it wrong to play it the same way? Who cares about giving a free card here when we are likely behind. I guess I say this b/c what do we do if we get raised on the flop or the turn (villian could easily semibluff raise AK, especially if he has a [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]) [/ QUOTE ] I think on the turn he has either AK or AQ. So bet it or check-raise it if you don't mind risking giving him a free card. Obviously we would love for an Ace to fall on the river, but there are only two of them left. He could have a gutshot draw in there or a flush draw or a straight draw come to think of it, so you have to pop him somewhere on the turn. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Classic Clarkmeister Theory?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] This flop check is horrible. I don't care if villain is TAG. [/ QUOTE ] We are WA/WB if villians 3 betting range is AA-JJ/AK. [/ QUOTE ] AK has 7 outs, more if he has a diamond or 2. not WB at all. [/ QUOTE ] Who cares about giving a free card here when we are likely behind. [/ QUOTE ] Why are you insistent on thinking we're behind? It's very close but still you need to bet this to see where you are. I think once you lead out, villain raises with anything that beats us (because of the double-diamond and semi-coordinated board). If he holds AK he merely calls, IMO. Unless of course he has AdKd, in which case he has 15 outs and is a favorite heads up, and may raise anyway. Lead out. If raised, I think it's safe to call. Unless he holds AA, you can count A's as outs. And of course, another J helps greatly. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Classic Clarkmeister Theory?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] This flop check is horrible. I don't care if villain is TAG. [/ QUOTE ] We are WA/WB if villians 3 betting range is AA-JJ/AK. [/ QUOTE ] AK has 7 outs, more if he has a diamond or 2. not WB at all. [/ QUOTE ] Who cares about giving a free card here when we are likely behind. [/ QUOTE ] Why are you insistent on thinking we're behind? It's very close but still you need to bet this to see where you are. I think once you lead out, villain raises with anything that beats us (because of the double-diamond and semi-coordinated board). If he holds AK he merely calls, IMO. Unless of course he has AdKd, in which case he has 15 outs and is a favorite heads up, and may raise anyway. Lead out. If raised, I think it's safe to call. Unless he holds AA, you can count A's as outs. And of course, another J helps greatly. [/ QUOTE ] So you want to bet/call the flop, then check/fold the turn UI? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Classic Clarkmeister Theory?
[ QUOTE ]
Why are you insistent on thinking we're behind? It's very close but still you need to bet this to see where you are. [/ QUOTE ] Leading out to 'see where you are', against a player who 3 bet you preflop when you're out of position is a very bad idea. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Classic Clarkmeister Theory?
[ QUOTE ]
Hi Fair i would have bet the flop and i certainly would have bet the turn after he checked the flop. You said the villian is tag not tricky or laggy so the river is an easy bet/fold. [/ QUOTE ] With Villain's 3-bet preflop and his TAG tendencies, my read was he would bet the flop when checked to allowing me to C/R him and then for me to lead the turn no matter what fell. His check behind me on the flop was a total surprise. When the 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] fell on the turn I immediately began thinking of Clarkmeisters Theory. It's hard to believe, but in 40,000 hands I haven't yet been OOP HU with a 4 flush by the river. Either I've folded, won the pot outright or there were 3+ players involved. When the 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] fell I was checking (right or wrongly) hoping he'd bet, I'd call and the Clarkmeister would fall into place. Which it did. I'm not too concerned with betting the flop since my original plan was to C/R. Later my goal was to see if I could get HU OOP when the 4th flush fell, then bet into him. ~ |
|
|