|
|
#61
12-10-2005, 01:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] if we can makes rules about not saying the word "poker" I don't see why we can't do this. [/ QUOTE ] That's not at all the same as requiring someone to post RL pictures just to keep his status on 2+2. [/ QUOTE ] A mod suspended Diablo for saying that two people were dating. I don't see why we can't do the same for someone posted absurd statements about hot chicks. The pic is just a way to avoid the suspension. Relax. [/ QUOTE ] And if their girlfriend isn't up to par? Do we ban them for banging an ugly? Great idea. 
|
|
#63
12-10-2005, 01:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't see why we can't do the same for someone posted absurd statements about hot chicks. The pic is just a way to avoid the suspension. Relax. [/ QUOTE ] That's fine. I'm just telling you that it will probably never happen. [/ QUOTE ] A few weeks ago I may have agreed with you. However, Astroglide's inception as mod combined with censored's awesomeness since his return and Dynasty's relaxed presence lately makes me think that it has a chance, at the very least.
|
|
#65
12-10-2005, 01:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] if we can makes rules about not saying the word "poker" I don't see why we can't do this. [/ QUOTE ] That's not at all the same as requiring someone to post RL pictures just to keep his status on 2+2. [/ QUOTE ] A mod suspended Diablo for saying that two people were dating. I don't see why we can't do the same for someone posted absurd statements about hot chicks. The pic is just a way to avoid the suspension. Relax. [/ QUOTE ] And if their girlfriend isn't up to par? Do we ban them for banging an ugly? Great idea. [/ QUOTE ] If they complain about little flaws in beautiful women (whether they be 2p2ers, celebs, girls from the bar, etc), but has been banging a 475lb elephant for 2 years, then why not? one less moron in OOT.
|
|
#66
12-10-2005, 01:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
istewart, Where did you find that pic? I googled for like 20 minutes trying to find that damned thing. Fark had it not. [/ QUOTE ] Old thread. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#67
12-10-2005, 01:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] if we can makes rules about not saying the word "poker" I don't see why we can't do this. [/ QUOTE ] That's not at all the same as requiring someone to post RL pictures just to keep his status on 2+2. [/ QUOTE ] A mod suspended Diablo for saying that two people were dating. I don't see why we can't do the same for someone posted absurd statements about hot chicks. The pic is just a way to avoid the suspension. Relax. [/ QUOTE ] And if their girlfriend isn't up to par? Do we ban them for banging an ugly? Great idea. [/ QUOTE ] No, we ridicule him until he kills himself. I call it "pulling a censored". (I'd like to point out that I'm joking about the censored thing. I do not think he did anything wrong or was responsible in any way for the death of his roommate in the army thread.)
|
|
#69
12-10-2005, 02:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
do you ever sleep?
|
|
#70
12-10-2005, 02:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
No, we ridicule him until he kills himself. I call it "pulling a censored". (I'd like to point out that I'm joking about the censored thing. I do not think he did anything wrong or was responsible in any way for the death of his roommate in the army thread.) [/ QUOTE ] I thought it was hilarious As for your plan. I pretty much always fall on the side of the more bannings the better when it comes to people being stupid.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
