#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OKLAHOMA @ UCLA.
Does anyone have a good reason not to like the under here at 52?
Oklahoma passed for only 42 yards on 13 attempts last week. Wouldn't such a running focused offense be likely to slow the game down substantially? I guess I just don't see how this game is likely to turn into a shootout. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OKLAHOMA @ UCLA.
I love the under. Oklahoma has a very stout D and struggling O. Both teams love to run the ball with Peterson and Drew, so it should be a short game. I see a 20-13 type score.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OKLAHOMA @ UCLA.
Wow...2 missed FG's, a fumbled punt return....UGLY...
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OKLAHOMA @ UCLA.
and it just got uglier... OU fumble and UCLA returns it for a TD. Is OU leading the NCAA in fumbles right now?
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OKLAHOMA @ UCLA.
I bet on UCLA because of the unranked favored over ranked team thingy. However, I noticed a few things about Oklahoma. They lost WAY too much talent to the draft last year and people are indeed still thinking about previous years when wagering on them. These guys are too young and therefore are making way too many mistakes. Additionally, they wont beat anyone decent until they get the passing game going to open up the run.
I think you watch these guys struggle for a couple more games and wait for the public to realize the things I stated above. Then, when the public realizes this team isn't all is has been in the past, some of these young guys will have a little more experience and you will probably find some value in the lines. *Just one person's point of view after watching this team stink it up. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OKLAHOMA @ UCLA.
go bruins [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OKLAHOMA @ UCLA.
UCLA looking good this year [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
so far 3-0 ATS |
|
|