Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Poker > Stud
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-27-2005, 01:51 PM
PoorLawyer PoorLawyer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 59
Default Re: Is this really correct?

[ QUOTE ]
Next, some math. I have seen 21 cards which leaves 31, two of which are aces. So there are 29*2 ways he can have an ace in the hole, or 58 ways. (Did I get this right?). So it’s 58:2 or 29:1 against me winning. Getting only 12:1, I can’t call this, no?

[/ QUOTE ]

this doesn't seem quite right because it doesn't account for the times when he has KK or QQ, or is that the :2 in 58:2? I used to be pretty good at math, but high school itself is barely a memory...

This is the only math I can figure here: You have to be certain that he has aces at least 11 out of 12 times (about 92% sure) to fold here. Can you ever be that sure about something in this game, especially at those limits? Granted, you have a good read on the guy, so it may be close
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-27-2005, 01:55 PM
MRBAA MRBAA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New York City \'burbs
Posts: 893
Default Re: Is this really correct?

But your opponent has given you much information during the play of the hand, so this is not a question of abstract odds alone. You're saying that he will NEVER have a starting hand other than pocket QQ, KK or split aces to call your double bet on fourth here. If that is true, your fold is correct. You know this player, we don't.

However, against most players they can have any live pocket pair to call your raise on fourth if they don't believe you have trips. Or a big three flush that paired jacks on fourth. If you assign any probability to those hands, you may have a call here.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-27-2005, 02:01 PM
PoorLawyer PoorLawyer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 59
Default Re: Is this really correct?

[ QUOTE ]
You're saying that he will NEVER have a starting hand other than pocket QQ, KK or split aces to call your double bet on fourth here. If that is true, your fold is correct.



[/ QUOTE ]

How so? If he has pocket KK or QQ than OP wins the hand with KKQQ vs. KKJJ or QQJJ.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-27-2005, 02:50 PM
MRBAA MRBAA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New York City \'burbs
Posts: 893
Default Re: Is this really correct?

Because Roland is comparing the pot odds to the card odds of his opponent having a hand he can beat. If he narrows the starting hands as specified, he does not have sufficient pot odds to call.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-27-2005, 04:16 PM
Roland Roland is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: rolled up again
Posts: 343
Default Re: Is this really correct?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You're saying that he will NEVER have a starting hand other than pocket QQ, KK or split aces to call your double bet on fourth here. If that is true, your fold is correct.



[/ QUOTE ]

How so? If he has pocket KK or QQ than OP wins the hand with KKQQ vs. KKJJ or QQJJ.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, those are the two times I win.
The other 58 times he will have aces up and I lose. Thus, the odds are 58:2 or 29:1 against me winning. I win this only 3.4% of the time (if my assumptions about his calling range are correct).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-27-2005, 04:21 PM
MRBAA MRBAA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New York City \'burbs
Posts: 893
Default Re: Is this really correct?

I have seen a Roland1 at 2-4. I look forward to tangling with you at some point. Don't ever fold kings up on the river against me!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-27-2005, 02:14 PM
Roland Roland is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: rolled up again
Posts: 343
Default Re: Is this really correct?

[ QUOTE ]
Or a big three flush that paired jacks on fourth.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think he folds that. And any pair lower than jacks.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-27-2005, 02:24 PM
BTirish BTirish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 128
Default Re: Is this really correct?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Or a big three flush that paired jacks on fourth.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think he folds that. And any pair lower than jacks.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, you know your opponent better than we do. For my part, I'm more likely to give it up with aces on 4th (or on 5th if my opponent had bet into my open J's) than I am with Q-Q-A-J. This is what offsets the fact that it is mathematically much more likely for him to have A-x than K-K or Q-Q.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-27-2005, 02:22 PM
dandy_don dandy_don is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 45
Default Re: Is this really correct?

[ QUOTE ]
Next, some math.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hope I entered this correctly, but I just wanted to see for myself what twodimes would show...

Result
http://twodimes.net/h/?z=1244890
pokenum -7s kh ks qs qc th 7c 6s - ad js jc 5c / ah 2d 9d 8c ts 7d 3d 6d 5s 9c
7-card Stud Hi: 26970 enumerated outcomes
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Ks Qs 6s Qc 7c Kh Th 16980 62.96 9990 37.04 0 0.00 0.630
Js Jc 5c Ad 9990 37.04 16980 62.96 0 0.00 0.370
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-27-2005, 04:04 PM
Roland Roland is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: rolled up again
Posts: 343
Default Re: Is this really correct?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Next, some math.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hope I entered this correctly, but I just wanted to see for myself what twodimes would show...

Result
http://twodimes.net/h/?z=1244890
pokenum -7s kh ks qs qc th 7c 6s - ad js jc 5c / ah 2d 9d 8c ts 7d 3d 6d 5s 9c
7-card Stud Hi: 26970 enumerated outcomes
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Ks Qs 6s Qc 7c Kh Th 16980 62.96 9990 37.04 0 0.00 0.630
Js Jc 5c Ad 9990 37.04 16980 62.96 0 0.00 0.370

[/ QUOTE ]

What’s this? Kings up vs. Jacks with an ace kicker?
I don’t get it… [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.