|
|
#1
12-22-2005, 08:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Set - too much/too little?
I have only 30 hands on this guy, 50/20 so far, seems overaggro what I can remember of.
5-handed, I raise Q [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] first in, BB 3-bets, I cap Flop is 8 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 9 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] He bets, I raise, he 3-bets, I call Turn is 5 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] He bets and it's capped River is 2 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] He bets, I raise, he 3-bets, I call 
|
|
#2
12-22-2005, 08:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Set - too much/too little?
I like this line, either this or just call a river bet. But does he 3-bet JT in this position, and does he give you credit for QQ from the SB?
True
|
|
#3
12-22-2005, 08:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Set - too much/too little?
I like it
|
|
#5
12-23-2005, 12:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Set - too much/too little?
What position did you have here? I think it does make a bit of a difference from UTG and Button in terms of BB's 3-betting range.
I'm quite tempted to cap the river here. I don't think even 50/20's 3-bet JTs PF very often from the BB, and much more rarely JTo. Let's try and put some likely combos out there though. FWIW, I think the combos you are ahead of are FAR more likely holdings than those you are behind given the action. You are behind: JTs - 4 combos JTo - 6 combos Ac9c - 1 combo Ac8c - 1 combo You are ahead of: 99 - 3 combos 88 - 3 combos Strictly by looking at numbers of combos, you are behind his range. However, giving proper weighting to them, I think it's very close between a call and a cap on the river.
|
|
#6
12-23-2005, 12:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Set - too much/too little?
[ QUOTE ]
does he give you credit for QQ from the SB? [/ QUOTE ] Hero can't be SB because villian acts first. I think we have to add AA,KK, AQ to the hands the villian might have here. I think this looks good. Although I might cap the flop, call a turn 3-bet and a river 3-bet (or just call a river bet if a diamond fell).
|
|
#7
12-23-2005, 12:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Set - too much/too little?
If you're going to list Ac8c and Ac9c (which I think are highly unlikely), you have to list AdQd, too. Even AA and KK should get some consideration for an aggro guy.
I think you put in just about the right number of bets. Even super LAGs usually slow down on the river.
|
|
#8
12-23-2005, 12:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Set - too much/too little?
[ QUOTE ]
If you're going to list Ac8c and Ac9c (which I think are highly unlikely), you have to list AdQd, too. Even AA and KK should get some consideration for an aggro guy. I think you put in just about the right number of bets. Even super LAGs usually slow down on the river. [/ QUOTE ] You're right about AA/KK (not AdQd though b/c hero has the Qd), and they should be added to the list of combos we are ahead of. I think a super LAG is not ever going to slow down on the river with 88/99. Obviously he won't slow down with JT, and there is a chance he would go nuts with KK/AA.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
