|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What the better Book WLLH or ITH?
What the better Book WLLH or ITH?
if you had to choose one what the better book? i have SSH. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What the better Book WLLH or ITH?
ITH and it's not even close.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What the better Book WLLH or ITH?
ITH ITH ITH ITH ITH
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What the better Book WLLH or ITH?
any reason why ITH is better?
and is ITH for low and micro limit holdem? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What the better Book WLLH or ITH?
MUCH more comprehensive! Many hand examples. Grest preflop chart. More aggresive.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What the better Book WLLH or ITH?
sorry for my ignorance but what is ITH?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ITH is not more aggressive preflop than WLLH
[ QUOTE ]
MUCH more comprehensive! Many hand examples. Great preflop chart. More aggresive. [/ QUOTE ] Examples in early position: ITH has you limping with JJ. WLLH says raise (as does SSHE). ITH says limp with 88 and 77 only after someone has already limped. Fold otherwise. WLLH says open limp with these pairs UTG (as does SSHE). ITH says limp KQs. WLLH says raise. ITH says fold KQo. WLLH says limp (as does SSHE). ITH says limp KJs and QJs only after 1 limper. Otherwise fold. WLLH says you can limp these hands UTG (as does SSHE). Thus, in early position, ITH is tighter and weaker than WLLH (and SSHE). Now, I am not saying WLLH is a better book. Just disputing the claim that it is more aggressive, at least in its preflop recommendations. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What the better Book WLLH or ITH?
If you are starting to grasp the concepts in SSH then there really is no need for you to study WLLH or ITH. If you are having problems understanding SSH then I'd suggest WLLH. I feel that ITH style play overall will probably win more than WLLH (because of the post-flop play differences), but WLLH style play will be easier to impliment.
|
|
|