OT: Pokerstars question that has been asked 1000 times before, sorry

[gisb0rne]

I prefer PStars. I 8-10 table the $27's and I don't think there's a limit to how many you can have at once. I can't tell you how soft they are relative to the PP games but I'd guess my ROI is a little over 20% in 2000+ games so they are certainly beatable for a decent amount. The only problem is that there aren't enough tables going at once past the $60's. Even at the $60's you'll be at 50-75% of the open tables if you're 8-tabling.

I find the PStars lobby to bet vastly better than PP because it updates. You don't have to refresh it a million times to see the new tables. There are a lot of mouse clicks to open the table but it's not that bad imo.

[Nick M]

I FoCKING KNEW YOU WERE A TWO PLUS TWOer!!!! God damnit...you are soooooooo avoided.

[runner4life7]

1 bump just to see if others have any opinions on this. Right now only 30ish 27s are going and 18ish 60s so I'm thinking this might be semi hard to 10 table during non peak hours.

[bennies]

I think I said this as late as yesterday... - I don't see much difference between the two sites when it comes to hourly rate, roi, etc.

[Melchiades]

[ QUOTE ]
1 bump just to see if others have any opinions on this. Right now only 30ish 27s are going and 18ish 60s so I'm thinking this might be semi hard to 10 table during non peak hours.

[/ QUOTE ]
10 tabling 60's during non peak hours isn't semi hard. It's impossible.