Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-27-2005, 12:56 PM
chadplusplus chadplusplus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 42
Default Re: Bad Players = Hard to Beat????

I recently encountered the same thing. A loose passive friend won a local charity tournament, so wanting to cash in on his new found poker confidence, we invited him to our regular cash game. Well...

The guy took 2 of my buy ins. Why? Because I was retarded... no, not retarded, more like hard headed. I knew I needed to tighten up, isolate the guy, and only value bet, but I was too hard headed.

In my own defense, the situation was a little more complex as the other players to my left were loose preflop and very weak thereafter, so I wanted to see a lot of flops and then push the others off if I smelled any weakness. It worked for the most part and I was picking up small pots left and right. The problem arose when the calling station guy refused to fold with J high or bottom pair, etc... so it usually ended up being 5 to the flop and 2 to the turn. But then, once I got it heads up, I was too hard headed to drop the chirade and kept betting into the guy ("God! Just freaking fold already!") and he kept calling and I kept losing my money.

The point is, most of us know how to beat a lot of different types of players. But it is having the discipline to do it that is key.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-27-2005, 03:17 PM
AlanBostick AlanBostick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: California
Posts: 127
Default Re: Bad Players = Hard to Beat????

The issue about playing with loose-passive players is that making plays against them just doesn't work. To the skilled player it can be like fighting with one hand tied behind your back, because half or more of the moves you usually use to take pots down don't work when the LPP is in the game.

The answer is, if the other guy is too dumb to fold to your check-raise bluff when the low card on the flop pairs on the turn, just don't make that play. You're going to have to show down the best hand to win. Meanwhile, LPP's presence in a lot of pots mean that you are more often getting a good price to chase draws. You can use LPP's passivity as a tool to get free cards when you need one, or to get more money into a pot when you have a good hand.

Bottom line, you have to play a different game when LPPs are at the table than when they aren't, and you have to know how to play that game.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-27-2005, 03:22 PM
AlanBostick AlanBostick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: California
Posts: 127
Default Re: Bad Players = Hard to Beat????

[ QUOTE ]
There seems to be a huge number of people who only want to play against - or are only comfortable playing against - one type of nitwit.

I never understood it and certainly never agreed with it but there are plenty of them.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you don't understand them, you aren't as good a poker player as you think you are.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-27-2005, 04:00 PM
WhoIam WhoIam is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Posts: 6
Default Re: Bad Players = Hard to Beat????

The problem with playing against bad players is that you are unable to use one of your most valuable tools, hand reading. Consequently, you are forced to gamble more because you have no idea where you stand in a hand because bad players don't play logically. This increases your variance and, while you will win more in the long run, you can easily get killed in one or a couple sessions. Basically playing total fish is like playing roulette but having an edge over the house.
In my opinion, the best overall player to to have as an opponent is the table coach, someone with a basic knowledge of strategy but who plays predictably and uncreatively. With them, it is easy to put them on a hand and either get out when they're strong or extract maximum value when they're weak. Playing heads-up, I could beat this player probably 90% of the time as opposed to maybe 70% for a total fish.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-27-2005, 04:09 PM
pzhon pzhon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 66
Default Re: Bad Players = Hard to Beat????

[ QUOTE ]
The issue about playing with loose-passive players is that making plays against them just doesn't work. To the skilled player it can be like fighting with one hand tied behind your back, because half or more of the moves you usually use to take pots down don't work when the LPP is in the game.

The answer is, if the other guy is too dumb to fold to your check-raise bluff when the low card on the flop pairs on the turn, just don't make that play.

[/ QUOTE ]
On the other hand, there are other plays you can make by using the loose passive player as a weapon against the other players. You can make a bet or raise to isolate the LPP, forcing out better hands that don't want to overcall. You can simultaneously bluff the normal players and make a thin value bet against the LPP. Even if you only have a 40% chance to beat the LPP, you may be happy to get it heads up because you pick up the dead money and have control over the hand later. A side benefit of this play is that it reinforces the LPP's desire to call all of your bets.

For example: I had KTo in the BB and checked. 4 saw the A83r flop. I checked, an aggressive EP player bet, the LPP called (any two), and I folded. In retrospect, I think the right play was to check-raise and bet the turn, which would very likely get the EP player to fold without an ace. KTo wins about 50% against the LPP's random hand.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-27-2005, 09:55 PM
ohnonotthat ohnonotthat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Jersey - near A.C.
Posts: 511
Default Re: Bad Players = Hard to Beat????

I meant I never understood their unwillingness to go with the flow.

I have no trouble understanding why they lose when they step out of their element, (this is what should happen) nor do I have any difficulty understanding why they don't simply adjust (they lack the skills/knowledge to do so).

- Oh my, I think we have found someone who is actually crankier than me. [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]

Try adding bran to your diet; it did wonders for my disposition. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

ALL RIGHT - WHERE THE (censored) IS MY FAVORITE CEREAL BOWL ? [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-28-2005, 11:09 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Bad Players = Hard to Beat????

Well first off all suckouts should be candidates for forced sterilization so they can not further spoil the gene pool. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
Calling stations in SNG's are different than rings because if you are wrong in a big hand it is game over which means no winning over the long haul. Myself just got blasted out of a decent paying tourney by a 99:1 longshot.

I have found what works best is to be patient with them and not pay off their monsters early, the key is to keep their chip stacks as low as possible and then hammer them when the blinds get higher. If you can keep their chip stacks low then you can survive if they do happen to hit. If they luck into some chips all you can is take your best shot and live with the results.

Calling stations in rings you just play a disciplined tight aggressive style and you will eventually get their money sometimes it just takes longer than you would like.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-29-2005, 09:26 PM
AlanBostick AlanBostick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: California
Posts: 127
Default Re: Bad Players = Hard to Beat????

[ QUOTE ]

Calling stations in SNG's are different than rings because if you are wrong in a big hand it is game over which means no winning over the long haul. Myself just got blasted out of a decent paying tourney by a 99:1 longshot.

[/ QUOTE ]

Arguing that calling stations are bad in SNGs because their bad call can suck out and bust you out is like saying calling stations are bad in cash games because a bad call can suck out and win a hand. You don't play one SNG in your life; you (presumably) play many over the long haul. And over the long haul, the bad calls by calling stations add to your win, just like they do in cash-game play. It's just that the long haul consists of many SNGs instead of many hands.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-29-2005, 09:28 PM
AlanBostick AlanBostick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: California
Posts: 127
Default Re: Bad Players = Hard to Beat????

[ QUOTE ]
I meant I never understood their unwillingness to go with the flow.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you don't understand this, then you are not as good a poker player as you think you are.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.