|
|
#11
10-21-2002, 07:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Typo in Sklansky Column
True, but I'm sure it's a typo because of the suggestion that someone might incorrectly think the answer should be 17 (instead of 21). Just changing girls to boys causes everything else to make perfect sense.
|
|
#12
10-22-2002, 02:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Typo in Sklansky Column
but what if one of the children who *isn't* a boy also *isn't* a girl. that happens sometimes, sadly. many corrections are needed to make this column make sense; Sklansky should make them before someone loses a bundle in a high stakes game
|
|
#13
10-22-2002, 05:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Typo in Sklansky Column
In my original post, I attempted, in all innocence, to point out a typo in David Sklansky's most recent column. I never considered the possibility that I was instigating a debate---I mean, what is there to debate? Guys: this is not complicated stuff. Let's give it a rest.
|
|
#14
10-22-2002, 10:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Typo in Sklansky Column
lol! [img]/forums/images/icons/grin.gif[/img]
we're just funning wid ya ronnie! [img]/forums/images/icons/smirk.gif[/img]
|
|
#15
10-23-2002, 06:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Typo in Sklansky Column
You guys had me worried. Mike, if you're ever in New York City, I'll buy you a pint of Guinness and introduce you to a fantastic Irish card magician at a pub called Cronin & Phelan's.
|
|
#16
10-23-2002, 08:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
That\'s a deal! Thx! (n/m)
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
