Tigerite

[curtains]

btw pushing with 44 is -EV. If anyone made a mistake its the cutoff. The cutoff incorrectly pushed, however the BB made a correct call if the cutoffs range included 44 (which it did).

[z32fanatic]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm not quite sure how you know I'm tigerite mind. Anyway - your range has to be 17% there. It's a no brainer call if you ask me.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would put his range here at 22+, A2+, KQ. This puts it at about a +.4% $EV right? I just bought SNGPT so I'm still learning some of this. Is .4% $EV an "easy call"? I would appreciate any insight into what makes this an easy call.

"Uber-shorty" has 2 BB less than you.... NC Tigerite. OP: stop whining. Don't push into the huge stack if you don't want to get called.

[tigerite]

By the way he pushed with 44, which needs ranges of 7%/9%/9% to be +$EV.. I would have folded in his position. But whatever.

[Snarf]

[ QUOTE ]
By the way he pushed with 44, which needs ranges of 7%/9%/9% to be +$EV.. I would have folded in his position. But whatever.

[/ QUOTE ]

Incredibly easy call....He pushed with 44 and was pissed enough to post it on 2+2?

Clearly you pwyned him.

p.s. My first usage of that word. How'd I do? I spelled it wrong ...didn't I?...

[runner4life7]

wow good2cu lost any potential credibility

[runner4life7]

pwned

[Scuba Chuck]

I get some kind of personal satisfaction by making plays like this for some reason. Teach that guy a lesson.

[fluorescenthippo]

[ QUOTE ]
By the way he pushed with 44, which needs ranges of 7%/9%/9% to be +$EV.. I would have folded in his position. But whatever.

[/ QUOTE ]

how did you figure this out? and are you using the "equity modeling" in sngpt in the calc?

[durron597]

This is a very easy call by tigerite.