Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-13-2005, 01:31 PM
atrifix atrifix is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: A Refutation of Determinism

[ QUOTE ]
The argument concerning LaPlace's Demon in this thread does a better job of refuting determinism

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think this refutes determinism. Laplace was one of the first ardent determinists. Your statement
[ QUOTE ]
I'm sure I could abstain from eating that bowl of ice cream.

[/ QUOTE ]
amounts essentially to saying "Determinism is false."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-13-2005, 01:27 PM
wtfsvi wtfsvi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 484
Default Re: A Refutation of Determinism

[ QUOTE ]
Therefore, you should do your best not to believe in (or at least not to act in accord with) determinism, as this decision seems to leave you with the highest possible EV.

[/ QUOTE ] Whether or not you believe in it doesn't affect your EV, but, as you correctly point out, whether or not you act in accord with it does.

Good post.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-13-2005, 01:55 PM
David Steele David Steele is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 428
Default Re: A Refutation of Determinism

I suggest you read the book
Elbow Room , it may settle your worries.

D.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-13-2005, 03:39 PM
maurile maurile is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 95
Default Re: A Refutation of Determinism

[ QUOTE ]
I suggest you read the book
Elbow Room , it may settle your worries.

D.

[/ QUOTE ]
Great book. So is Consciousness Explained by the same author.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-13-2005, 01:57 PM
NotReady NotReady is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 70
Default Re: A Refutation of Determinism

[ QUOTE ]

In conclusion, it is the nut best belief to trust in free will, whether or not it actually exists. Make sense?


[/ QUOTE ]

The real issue seems to be how can we escape determinism on a non-theistic basis. The only option is pure randomness which doesn't appear any more attractive than pure determinism. The core difficulty is that it's impossible for a non-theistic metaphysic to provide rational justification to the idea that human life has any significance whatsover.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-13-2005, 03:23 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A Refutation of Determinism

[ QUOTE ]
The core difficulty is that it's impossible for a non-theistic metaphysic to provide rational justification to the idea that human life has any significance whatsover.

[/ QUOTE ]

Rational Justification:

P1) Humans determine significance
P2) I am a human
P3) My life is signficant to me
C) Human life is significant
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-13-2005, 05:24 PM
NotReady NotReady is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 70
Default Re: A Refutation of Determinism

[ QUOTE ]

C) Human life is significant


[/ QUOTE ]

What's significant about a cosmic accident that no one remembers when it's disappeared?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-13-2005, 05:55 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A Refutation of Determinism

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

C) Human life is significant


[/ QUOTE ]

What's significant about a cosmic accident that no one remembers when it's disappeared?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's significant to me, right now. It makes me happy.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-13-2005, 07:12 PM
hmkpoker hmkpoker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 116
Default Re: A Refutation of Determinism

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

C) Human life is significant


[/ QUOTE ]

What's significant about a cosmic accident that no one remembers when it's disappeared?

[/ QUOTE ]

Significance is relative. My life is the most significant thing to me.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-13-2005, 03:38 PM
maurile maurile is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 95
Default Re: A Refutation of Determinism

[ QUOTE ]
A) All actions are fully predetermined by the laws of physics, etc., and an omniscient being with full information could give you the complete state of the universe at any point in space-time; thus, free will does not exist

[/ QUOTE ]
That doesn't follow at all. "Free will" means doing what you want. It doesn't mean acting randomly. Free will and determinism are compatible.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.