|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
villain\'s hand....
after i showed QQ, he flipped over two black aces. Is showing still a bad play if you believe villain will show his cards too?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: villain\'s hand....
[ QUOTE ]
after i showed QQ, he flipped over two black aces. Is showing still a bad play if you believe villain will show his cards too? [/ QUOTE ] yes. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: villain\'s hand....
[ QUOTE ]
after i showed QQ, he flipped over two black aces. [/ QUOTE ] WHO DIDNT KNOW THAT? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: villain\'s hand....
I'm interested in your reasoning for showing. Why do you think it's smart? How will you exploit the info you just gave later in the game? Or is it just a "See what a great laydown I am making, how cool am I".?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: villain\'s hand....
[ QUOTE ]
after i showed QQ, he flipped over two black aces. Is showing still a bad play if you believe villain will show his cards too? [/ QUOTE ] Yes, I think so. You have much more information about his hand than he does about yours, and if he's a thinking player, he's trying to understand your massive PF overbet. Your show gives him way too much information about it. His responsive show helps you somewhat, but AA is certainly in the range of hands he'd play just that way -- so his showing doesn't get you that much. Once the big overbet is in, I would have played it just like you did -- except for the show. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: villain\'s hand....
[ QUOTE ]
after i showed QQ, he flipped over two black aces. Is showing still a bad play if you believe villain will show his cards too? [/ QUOTE ] A lot of people play poker as a competetition, to prove they are better then everyone else. Your play exhibits this behaviour. Do not continue it. |
|
|