|
|
|
|
#1
05-17-2005, 05:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
This was a Clarkmeister, was it?
Clarkmeister correct applied?
Party Poker 0.5/1 Hold'em (10 handed) converter Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, MP2 calls, MP3 calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Button calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, BB checks. Flop: (5.50 SB) K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font> BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, MP2 folds, <font color="#CC3333">MP3 raises</font>, Button folds, BB folds, Hero calls. Turn: (4.75 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP3 bets</font>, Hero calls. River: (6.75 BB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, MP3 folds. Final Pot: 7.75 BB 
|
|
#2
05-17-2005, 05:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This was a Clarkmeister, was it?
i'm confused or missing something or just plain stupid....what EXACTLY do you have in this hand to bet that river for?
was this play based on a read?
|
|
#4
05-17-2005, 06:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This was a Clarkmeister, was it?
[ QUOTE ]
i'm confused or missing something or just plain stupid....what EXACTLY do you have in this hand to bet that river for? was this play based on a read? [/ QUOTE ] Also, I'm not too thrilled about playing 57s UTG, nor about semibluffing an OESD into 4 .5/1 opponents.
|
|
#6
05-17-2005, 07:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This was a Clarkmeister, was it?
[ QUOTE ]
While this hand isn't a good example of much it is a good reminder that there are times when the only way you can win is by betting. [/ QUOTE ] This is horrible. Just because betting is the only way you can win doesn't mean you should bet. Krishan
|
|
#7
05-17-2005, 07:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This was a Clarkmeister, was it?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] While this hand isn't a good example of much it is a good reminder that there are times when the only way you can win is by betting. [/ QUOTE ] This is horrible. Just because betting is the only way you can win doesn't mean you should bet. Krishan [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, I edited out the part where I made it clearer that I only meant the river bet. I don't think people use that play often enough. Especially against multitabling rocks who are really vulnerable to it.
|
|
#8
05-17-2005, 10:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This was a Clarkmeister, was it?
[ QUOTE ]
This is horrible. Just because betting is the only way you can win doesn't mean you should bet. Krishan [/ QUOTE ] Really? Don't you think your opponent folds here often enough at .50/1.00 with no [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] to make this +EV?
|
|
#10
05-17-2005, 10:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This was a Clarkmeister, was it?
Am I the only one here who has heard of clarkmeister's theorem? I guess so
Well applied For those of you who are unfamiliar with it. clarkmeister's theorem is a situational theorem where there is 4 of a suit on the board, you are HU and, OOP. What clarkeister suggests is, despite the fact is -EV any way you play it, betting out is less -EV then just check-calling because you have some fold equity. Once again, nice hand
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
