The "New" Porn - Page 2

B Dids · #11 11-29-2005, 07:11 PM

This is bothering me.

IT should be Otis's Legal Advice, as the s' rule doesn't apply to proper names. I may have to fix this myself.

Ulysses · #12 11-29-2005, 07:17 PM

Vex: The idea of that definitely makes me want to puke more than it turns me on.

Macdaddy Warsaw · #13 11-29-2005, 07:21 PM

But that means it still turns you on a little, right?

vexvelour · #14 11-29-2005, 07:40 PM

lol @ the general consensus

B Dids · #15 11-29-2005, 07:41 PM

[ QUOTE ]
This is bothering me.

IT should be Otis's Legal Advice, as the s' rule doesn't apply to proper names. I may have to fix this myself.

[/ QUOTE ]

After much depate, it would seem that either is acceptable. Updates may follow!

Ulysses · #16 11-29-2005, 07:47 PM

MacDaddy: lolz, ROFL, etc. Yes, you caught me w/ some horrible wording there. Let me restate: The very idea of that type of "porn" disgusts me and there's no way it would turn me on at all.

Your friend,
El Diablo

Black Aces 518 · #17 11-29-2005, 10:21 PM

I'm sure when you thought of your 15,000th post, you imagined it would be discussing the bonerificness of porn featuring dumpage in the cooter.

ChipWrecked · #18 11-29-2005, 10:33 PM

Oh, God, no.

I'm sure it was a well formed treatise in HMNL, and we only see the 15k here.

ChipWrecked · #19 11-29-2005, 10:35 PM

"Hey, Cartman, isn't that your mom?"

#20 11-29-2005, 11:31 PM

[ QUOTE ]
"Hey, Cartman, isn't that your mom?"

[/ QUOTE ]

GODDAMNIT