Post deleted by Mat Sklansky

[Frequitude]

My K-6 caught a 5 on Paradise last night. It must be a bug.

I'm up about $1.70 there this week.

[Siegmund]

[ QUOTE ]

The odds of that happening are like in the thowsands.


[/ QUOTE ]

You lost ten bets in a row. Each bet was a bit worse than even money. So... ah.. .the odds of that happening are one in several hundred. (1023:1 for even money bets.) Tough break there, pal, but it happens to hundreds of people every day even at honest internet casinos.

[Mike Haven]

How could you possibly think that an industry where one casino sends out the spam e-mail as below is not totally honest in all its dealings?

"Dear Player,

iVegas.com Casino (through the iGaming Networks) is giving away money to each player who votes for them on Gambling Online Magazine's readers poll. Vote now for iVegas.com, and you will be awarded a $10.00 Bonus at their Online Casino up front, and an additional $10 Bonus when they win for top categories.

If you feel that we deserve a "Top Site" honor, simply click here and fill in the form to cast your vote. Email your vote confirmation to *** @ *** for your credit and one of our friendly support staff will take care of the rest. Please allow 48 hours for the credit.

Sincerely Yours,"

[sfwusc]

True.

I love how people say stuff is rigged just b/c they lose. They havent played enough hands to see everything happen so they say its rigged its rigged.

I think I am going to start iggy listed all these posters that post this worthless crap.

SFWUSC

[Freudian]

[ QUOTE ]
True.

I love how people say stuff is rigged just b/c they lose. They havent played enough hands to see everything happen so they say its rigged its rigged.

I think I am going to start iggy listed all these posters that post this worthless crap.

SFWUSC

[/ QUOTE ]

There have been online casinos that have had blackjacks that give totally unrealistic results (-4 and -5 standard deviations). So there is every reason to be sceptical.

But in those cases the sample size is bigger than 10 hands.

[moondogg]

[ QUOTE ]
The odds of that happening are like in the thowsands.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why do I get the feeling that you have no idea who to calculate those odds?

[Subby]

You had 10 units.

Next time you are kickin' it at WoO, check out the ROR charts and you'll see what happened to you was about as rigged as the moon landing...

[Rah]

I have wagered a lot more than... well at least 100k on online BJ and my results reflect the expected house advantage more or less spot on.

[peinchka]

[ QUOTE ]
YOU ARE AN IDIOT..in full caps.

I have made not hundreds..not thousands but tens of thousands off of online blackjack. Now shut your piehole before you make yourself look even more stupid if thats possible.

[/ QUOTE ]

If this were true - then why would you want other people to know about it and kill your cash cow. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[OrangeKing]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
True.

I love how people say stuff is rigged just b/c they lose. They havent played enough hands to see everything happen so they say its rigged its rigged.

I think I am going to start iggy listed all these posters that post this worthless crap.

SFWUSC

[/ QUOTE ]

There have been online casinos that have had blackjacks that give totally unrealistic results (-4 and -5 standard deviations). So there is every reason to be sceptical.

But in those cases the sample size is bigger than 10 hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

I know WoO documented in detail at least one online casino that was cheating people, and even figured out what seemed to be the method of cheating: basically, if the dealer took one card and busted, it would randomly take another card instead (which it would keep no matter what). Kind of a strange way of doing so, but the numbers seemed to indicate this was exactly what was going on.

But most reputable online blackjack games are beatable..if they have nice cushy bonuses [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]